Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@Lollipop wrote:
Just fell down the stairs… black and blue all over. My elbow is killing like mad.
you JUST fell down the stairs and immediately felt the need to write it on a message board? How odd.
@lancsman48 wrote:
Pb is as funny as Rabies in a guide dogs home but…thinks he’s a singer really.
its not his fault his joke went over your head – get a sense of humour you boring git
@catmanblue wrote:
janey have you posted on every single thread going :?: if so….. why :?:
whats it gotta do with you, are you the board police or something?
@forumhostpb wrote:
Next thing we’ll be told is that this meet will be at “The Cock Inn, Tillet, Herts.”
:lol: :lol:
@janey wrote:
what is and where is the lobby???
I’ll leave Doa to point you in the right direction :wink:
@janey wrote:
we don’t degrade our seleves….
Talking about scat to a dirty old man on the phone, no its not degrading at all is it :shock: glad you enjoy your job :-…
How can you iron womens underwear, theres nothing to iron…. unless of course you wear bank raiders? :shock: :-
@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
Hotel rooms are about £50 per night; I still think you would be better off looking for a 1p ryanair flight to somewhere warm.
Not if they all share the same room :wink:
@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
But there is a problem; people and computers get things wrong.
So there is a theory that if your DNA is enters wrong on the dada base you could spend years in prison for a crime you didn’t commit.
DNA evidence is not 100% and any good barrister will tell you that.
It’s only an “indicator” and on its own would never stand up in court.
I think overall the DNA database is a good idea, but I have to agree with Doa :shock: that there is a worry that your DNA could somehow become mixed up with someone elses on the system. Mistakes do happen, and you could find yourself being convicted for something you didnt do. On this basis, im not sure that it would be fair to convict someone on DNA evidence alone.
