Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
14 July, 2006 at 10:24 pm #230469
:lol: It is unlikely. I’d always assumed you’d be an Imp, Slayer.
14 July, 2006 at 10:20 pm #23046614 July, 2006 at 10:18 pm #139253Jimmy was just coming out of school
When the drug-dealer came
Give me some of that heroin
Some of that cocaineHeroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaineJimmy’s teacher was very annoyed
He gave Jimmy the cane
He shared his syringe with a class full of boys
Now they all want the sameHeroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaineJimmy’s turn to die
But please don’t you cry
Because Jimmy is in heaven with his drugs
And the angels all tryHeroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaine
Heroin, heroin and cocaineThe Tiger Lillies ~ Heroin and Cocaine
14 July, 2006 at 10:13 pm #230464@Gentle Ben wrote:
To be honest I don’t care who is trying to make me think I have to change to “accommodate” other cultures. A good bloke/woman is a good bloke/woman in my eyes, sod the religion thing I’m not interested.
Never a wiser word spoken. Well, perhaps by me but never by any of you lot.
12 July, 2006 at 11:50 pm #230090It occurs to me that there hasn’t been an occupying army of any size in the history of the world that we could point to as flawless in its conduct. The difference lies in whether evil behaviour like this is sanctioned or investigated and prosecuted. We’ve already seen British soldiers facing courts martial for their behaviour as well as Americans. This indicates that the coalition forces belong to the latter camp.
As for the relative low rank of those prosecuted so far, including those taken to account over Abu Ghraib, well, it’s a well known law of anthropology that shit rolls down hill. In a liberal democracy like the United States or the United Kingdom, it is impossible to prosecute those to which no said faecal matter has attached itself. Perhaps it is an argument in favour of us adopting the kind of vicious, summary justice that is so prevalent across the Muslim world. But I don’t think so. I’m one of those old fashioned softy liberals who would rather guilty men go free than risk innocent men being punished unfairly.
The point, I think, is that this incident, however revolting and wicked, has nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of the occupation itself. If we were to follow that logic, we might easily point to the (equally revolting and, some might say, much worse) atrocities perpetuated by the insurgents as a justification for the whole enterprise.
12 July, 2006 at 12:55 am #139248:D
He’s the greatest! He’s fantastic!
Wherever there is danger, he’ll be there!
He’s the ace! He’s amazing!
He’s the strongest, he’s the quickest, he’s the best!
Dangermouse!He’s terrific! He’s magnifique!
He’s the greatest secret agent in the world!
Dangermouse: powerhouse!
He’s the fastest, he’s the bravest, he’s the best!
Dangermouse! (Amazing!)
Dangermouse! (Astounding!!)
Dangermouse!Mike Harding ~ Dangermouse Theme
12 July, 2006 at 12:49 am #230083:-s Saddam prosecuted his security forces if they got out of hand?
12 July, 2006 at 12:45 am #22996312 July, 2006 at 12:42 am #230053Poor old Sid. Shine on.
12 July, 2006 at 12:40 am #229926Balls to that. I’d have Jim Morrison back. :D
-
AuthorPosts

