Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
9 October, 2006 at 11:41 pm #243946
what ya’all talkin about?? :shock: :shock: :shock:
9 October, 2006 at 11:39 pm #18844026 July Yarmouth, about 10 hours sleep in 7 days,
when was the last time ya stayed up all nite and made work the next day??
9 October, 2006 at 11:38 pm #142566hmmmmmmm, got work in the morning…….
9 October, 2006 at 11:36 pm #242325@token_male wrote:
Kym was in saturday night fever the musical after her relationship to jack ryder (jamie mitchell from eastenders) broke up and had one semi succesful album. Suzanne had darren days baby and also was in summer holiday the musical, Noel was on some holiday rep programme, Myleene the most succesful out of em all is HUGE in the classical world
and danny is working on shrek 3 and as far as i know.back to the topic!!
:D 8) :D
token you big fan you!!!!!!!!!!
9 October, 2006 at 11:34 pm #243975Brilliant day, still hungover :oops: my dad had 1 nil to scotland at the bookies. when I text him, he is a yes no ok answerer if you know what I mean, I texted him after the game and said how much did ya win his reply was “I do not know, nor do I care” its the longest text message he has ever sent me in life so far!!
well done scotland, lets hope the Ukrane dont f*ck it up.
9 October, 2006 at 11:30 pm #243990@matty wrote:
i once sent somone an ocean colour scene cd.. i never got praise like this :(
send it to me, I will big your end up for you….
9 October, 2006 at 11:29 pm #243561@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
@sweetasbaileez wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Unless it expressly says in the terms and conditions of the travelcard that a person has to remove a hat or sunglasses or any other item that might obscure a face, then the woman is entirely within her rights to refuse to remove her veil. If her photo is in the photocard and her ticket is valid then she is travelling legally and complying by the terms of her ticket as far as I’m aware. You’d have to ask a ticket inspector if you want a definitive answer since I’m just guessing what the legal situation is.
But if her face is not visible, how is the bus driver to know if its a valid photo or not ??? :roll: ](*,) If her face is showing on the photograph then I fail to see how it became an issue for her not to show the bus driver ?? She’s already shown it several times, so where is the issue in showing it again :?: :?: It all boils down to pure ignorance on her part and the fact that she feels she is above the law. No matter how you look at it MrB, the bus driver acted correctly, if it were a young lower class Chav he asked to remove his cap, he would have also been well within his rights to refuse his pass and expect him to pay. Yet the Chav wouldn’t get such a response from the Bus Company would he ???
How can you quote me and yet completely overlook what I’ve said? The way I see it, she probably has the right to refuse to remove her veil unless it says in the terms and conditions of sale that a person has to remove any facial obstruction when asked to by the driver. As I already said, if she has a photocard and a valid ticket then she is not breaking any law so how can she be acting above the law. There’s no law that says you have to remove your veil when travelling on a bus.
The bus driver was trying to do his job properly but he became pedantic. He could have just let her go and then spoke to the bus company about changing their policy. That would have been the right approach. You say the driver was within his rights to refuse her pass but was he? Is he allowed to turn down a valid ticket if he has doubts about the identity of the bearer or does he have to be sure that the bearer and the person in the photo are not the same?
The point I’m trying to make is that if there’s nothing in the terms and conditions that states that a person has to remove a veil or cap or anything like that then surely a person has the right to refuse to remove an item and still be allowed to travel. A person refused travel because they refused to remove an item could probably take legal action against the bus company.
With a passport it’s a different matter because there are serious security and safety issues attached to international travel. Therefore, the people checking passports have a duty of care towards the staff and other passengers (among others) to verify the identity of all travellers.
On reflection, maybe the driver has the right to turn down the pass and the woman has the right not to remove her veil. That being said, because the ticket was valid and there was nothing saying that she had to remove her veil, the woman probably has grounds to sue for the breach of the agreement.
Think yourself lucky you are not a London Bus Driver Mr B!!
9 October, 2006 at 11:26 pm #243953behind your insults to each other Em and Mr B, I have to say I have watched her on the program a few times and she has made rasist comments previously. as have most black/asian politicians.
sorry Mr B, im not taking sides here hun, just saying what I have seen and it does stick in my mind, but because it is in the past I have no hard evidence of it.
Put it this way, had she been white and said the same, there would have been an outcry.
9 October, 2006 at 11:22 pm #243970so come on then, what pi$$ed you of so much about this particular issue then?…. share the gos lol!!!
9 October, 2006 at 10:50 pm #244017If you are in a position to get a mortgage now then do it now. dont wait. it aint gonna get any cheaper. A mate of mine got a mortgage 10 years ago and its nearly paid off (she is only 27 lol!!) but the later you leave it the harder it gets.
But on the other hand renting can be fun. Get a decent lodger in, pocket a bit of the rent, and you aint in tonnes of sh1t, sorry, I mean debt lol!!
either way, sounds like a good chapter of life coming up for you! :wink:
-
AuthorPosts
