Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@emmalush wrote:
Last year, the BNP were described as “racist” for saying English people deserved housing ahead of foreigners, but now the then accusser of racism Margaret Hodge, is saying the opposite.
Not happy with voter apathy enabeling Labour the winning edge in every election, now its total domination the aim, by making us dizy moving the political goal posts for even more votes.
Is Margaret Hodge the racist, the horrible racist thug she claimed the BNP were?
Because Margaret Hodge went out of her way to say Britons OF ALL COLOURS deserved housing- the BNP stick to the notion that ONLY white Britons deserve housing
@woohoo wrote:
Don’t know what’s worse; being albanian, or having a name like; gerald! :?
I met someone from the net, she was called Lucy. She charged £100 per hour, and i’ve not seen her since. OH, and there was a time when i met someone called frances too, but she weren’t all she appeared to be. She had a beard, a pot belly. It’s not the beard that made me realise she was a he, it was when she said bend over in a deep voice, that’s when i started to shyte myself. :oops:
was that deliberate or unintentional?/
Either way, it gave me the best laugh tonight :lol:
@emmalush wrote:
Oh, and er yeah, i nearly forgot, the local media link doesn’t state which party he belongs to, media – old gang, old gang – media.
Emma, its a “local” paper- local papers dont print MP’s affiliations because “local” people know which party their “local” MP is from without having to repeat it every time the “local” paper mentions the “local” MP’s name.
Happpens here too, every time the Lincoln MP’s name is in the “local” paper, it nevers mentions Labour as everyone round here knows she is a Labour MP cos she’s the “local” MP.
nah, I dont misinterpret nothing
I jus hav one headphone on one ear n the other ear out for the bairn- hence im always lopsided
Most people “hope” she will be found alive but most people “expect” her to be found dead (law of probability again)- the fact that it is “unknown” is simply another way of stating the ble/eding obvious- of course its unknown- it can only be unknown as it isnt known!
N you dont have to “see” my point- I only post for my own benefit, not that of others
@ubermik wrote:
If she was still “here” they wouldnt have even taken her on holiday with them, and that would have been even more selfish leaving them at home while they went on a romantic holiday wouldnt it?
“here” does not have to mean within the immediate vicinity, “here” can be virtual, a phrase or expression designed to infer someones location is known
But of course, you know that
@ubermik wrote:
After all, we dont KNOW she is dead, its just a very likely possibility, she might just have been abducted by some childless nutters or been taken to be sold into the sex industry or kept as a sex toy by some paedos and still for the moment be alive in either instance
very possible indeed- we dont KNOW many things but we use the rule of probability and make informed decisions- I dont KNOW there wont be a mobile speed camera on my way to work tomorrow but there hasnt been for the last 3 years so I’ll assume there wont be tomorrow.
People chose to be less fettered by the notion that feelings and emotions are only reserved for someone or thing you know and love and cannot be transferred onto someone or thing that as an individual in unknown to you but with which (or whom) you can empathise and sympathise, whether as a parent yourself, or someone who has recently lost something etc-
I once touched Cliff Burtons boot n trouser leg- Sheffield City Hall- bout 1986?
Oops- have lost track of time- shoulda said last hundred years, this century is only 6 1/2 years old
my bad
V festival tickets
Because of the Times
Kings of Leon
this is the same FBI who said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and through their advice led this country into the most pointless, most harmful, most insane act of war this country has undertaken this century (even worse than Suez).
Yep, I’ll believe everything they say, thanks Emma
