[sweetasbaileez]

If you that desperate for a place to live matty, I have a nice shed, with window…Its furnished ( with patio set and sun loungers) You can have it for 250 pcm no problem :wink: :P
Girl friends are welcome as long as i can set up a secret video and sell on the net :shock:

[sweetasbaileez]

@bert wrote:

some of that was double-dutch to me Sweet but I’d ;ove to chat with ya XXX

Then sign in online and you might be lucky :!: :shock: :P :wink:

[sweetasbaileez]

Blimey another jc tart hey Bert :?: :!: :wink: Never mind will add you anyhow and post script so you know which girlie you might chat to at a future innocent and totally sex free time :shock: :oops: :wink:

[sweetasbaileez]

@pats wrote:

@sweetasbaileez wrote:

@pats wrote:

@sweetasbaileez wrote:

@sweetasbaileez wrote:

@pats wrote:

hes the one in the middle girls !!!!!

Hi Bert welcome to jc hun….btw you available cos i wouldnt say no :wink: :P :shock: :P

Just spotted where you live… :shock: Im in herts… :wink: Pass over your addy and will be there asap :P :P :shock:

i’ll grab him in msn an tell him ur lustin after him. :wink:

Am still waiting :!: :wink: :P :shock:

i’m on the case lol. :wink: :wink:

:oops: :wink: :P

[sweetasbaileez]

@emmalush wrote:

Lets get ONE thing clear before we go any further.

There is NO corruption in football.

There maybe corruption in the business side of the game.

Made me laugh today, sky interviewed the main agent involved in the panarama documentary, the edited version shouted to sky’s subcribers not to panic, keep subscribing.

Anyway, all involved deny any wrong doing, and theres no real evidence either way.

We all know theres corruption, as proved with former arsenal manager george graham.

The question is, how much corruption is there, and how will it effect the proffessional side of the game?

Probably a good bloke to ask is Bruce Grobbelar :wink:

[sweetasbaileez]

=D> =D> :shock: :P

[sweetasbaileez]

@pats wrote:

@sweetasbaileez wrote:

@sweetasbaileez wrote:

@pats wrote:

hes the one in the middle girls !!!!!

Hi Bert welcome to jc hun….btw you available cos i wouldnt say no :wink: :P :shock: :P

Just spotted where you live… :shock: Im in herts… :wink: Pass over your addy and will be there asap :P :P :shock:

i’ll grab him in msn an tell him ur lustin after him. :wink:

Am still waiting :!: :wink: :P :shock:

[sweetasbaileez]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

Unless it expressly says in the terms and conditions of the travelcard that a person has to remove a hat or sunglasses or any other item that might obscure a face, then the woman is entirely within her rights to refuse to remove her veil. If her photo is in the photocard and her ticket is valid then she is travelling legally and complying by the terms of her ticket as far as I’m aware. You’d have to ask a ticket inspector if you want a definitive answer since I’m just guessing what the legal situation is.

But if her face is not visible, how is the bus driver to know if its a valid photo or not ??? :roll: ](*,) If her face is showing on the photograph then I fail to see how it became an issue for her not to show the bus driver ?? She’s already shown it several times, so where is the issue in showing it again :?: :?: It all boils down to pure ignorance on her part and the fact that she feels she is above the law. No matter how you look at it MrB, the bus driver acted correctly, if it were a young lower class Chav he asked to remove his cap, he would have also been well within his rights to refuse his pass and expect him to pay. Yet the Chav wouldn’t get such a response from the Bus Company would he ???

[sweetasbaileez]

@drivel wrote:

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

It’s an issue of religious freedom. This country has had a long history of religious intolerance, so the last thing we need is the state telling people what aspects of their religion they should be able to carry out.

As for the bus-pass issue I don’t think it’s important unless you’re getting loads of people wearing full veils. If you only get one person like that then you might as well not trouble yourself over it. I would just let them on rather than being pedantic. The only time when you should insist about seeing their face should be when you’re checking their passport or something important like that.

it’s not an issue of religious freedom at all – it’s as Ruby pointed out – when in Rome !!
What are they hiding behind their veils ???
If a drive has to verify a us pass by seeing the face then so he must – there’s no excuse – he should have kicked her off the bus
Anyone who want to use veils etc as an excuse to not abide by the laws of this country , then they should pop over to a country where they can wear them to their life’s content – and bloody stop over there !!![/quot

What Drivel Says…… =D> =D> With bells on and then some…… :wink:

[sweetasbaileez]

Well I thought it was funny…but what the hell am I ?? Notyhing but a fully qualified RGN with an NVQ 3 in hairdressing and a NVQ2 in indian head massage :roll: :roll: :P :wink:

[Author]

Posts