Terry

Anyway, returning to the subject and ignoring panda’s usual stupidity, Obama got 10 million fewer votes than he did in 2008 and only just managed to scrape past the 50% mark. Not bad in a two-horse race huh?

His first term saw the US deficit grow to $1.3 trillion and looks like getting even bigger over the next four years. He can’t get anything…[Read more]

@panda12 wrote:

@Terry wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

You are not a racist, a homophobe or a sexist yet you support UKIP?

Correct. UKIP do not have anything to do with racism. homophobia or sexism just so you know.

They do and if you can’t see it, you need to go to Specsavers and pdq.

:roll:

If the UK ever left it would – hopefully – start a breakup of the union as a whole.

Let’s face it: it was Hitler’s plan to invade Europe and form a federation of European nations with himself as the dictatorial head of state.

His vision is fast becoming become a reality despite the widespread opposition to it.

@panda12 wrote:

@Terry wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

Four years of no Republican President is a good thing.

Are you accusing the Republicans of being racist, homophobic and sexist then..?

:roll:

You obviously see words that aren’t there.

I just know how your mind works (or doesn’t)

@panda12 wrote:

@Terry wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

Europe should have no say over our political and social structure or how we spend our internal revenue but we cannot afford to be isolated from them when it comes to free trade.

In other words we should just shut up and take it up the a.rse because if we don’t we won’t be allowed to increase our already…

[Read more]

@panda12 wrote:

Four years of no Republican President is a good thing.

Are you accusing the Republicans of being racist, homophobic and sexist then..?

@panda12 wrote:

You are not a racist, a homophobe or a sexist yet you support UKIP?

Correct. UKIP do not have anything to do with racism. homophobia or sexism just so you know.

@panda12 wrote:

Europe should have no say over our political and social structure or how we spend our internal revenue but we cannot afford to be isolated from them when it comes to free trade.

In other words we should just shut up and take it up the a.rse because if we don’t we won’t be allowed to increase our already huge deficit by importing…[Read more]

@panda12 wrote:

On the contrary, your blinded support for them in the face of the evidence for their blatant discrimination says more about you than it does me. :roll:

Blinded support = not supporting the Labour Party. :roll:

What evidence are you referring to?

@rubyred wrote:

personally I am of the Theory that 9/11 was an inside job. I can appreciate the fact that is a different kettle of Fish.

that is all .

What is the ‘inside job’ theory? :shock:

Four more years of Obama is not as bad as four more years of George W Bush.

@panda12 wrote:

@Terry wrote:

Maybe you should make a connection between Labour and BNP: both are actively involved with discrimination. UKIP are more concerned with a withdrawal from the EU.

Maybe you should read my opening post on this thread.

UKIP may not be actively involved in discrimination but that’s only because they have no MPs and I…

[Read more]

@momentaryloss wrote:

Not sure that I agree with you about your two examples.

Don’t worry about it – I tend to overlook your reasoning too.

@momentaryloss wrote:

It therefore comes down to ideology.

In reality it comes down to profit and loss and the EU is (always has been and always will be) a trading loss for the UK.

It’s all very well to say we can’t survive without being members of the EU, but that is a completely ridiculous standpoint to have.

China isn’t a member of the EU and…[Read more]

@momentaryloss wrote:

True Terry the link between UKIP and discrimination is not based on the party’s public platform, but on the avowed views of some of those who associate with it.

UKIP would need to get rid of anyone with BNP or similar connections to escape that.

I don’t agree with the views of UKIP but it needn’t be associated with…

[Read more]

@sceptical guy wrote:

@Terry wrote:

@momentaryloss wrote:

The only potential route to success we have outside the EU is to compete on wages with the rest of Europe

Our trade with the EU leaves us with a yearly deficit of £60 billion.
Please explain the potential route to success of that stategy.

please explain why you ignore answers to this point,…

[Read more]

@momentaryloss wrote:

The only potential route to success we have outside the EU is to compete on wages with the rest of Europe

Our trade with the EU leaves us with a yearly deficit of £60 billion.
Please explain the potential route to success of that stategy.

Maybe you should make a connection between Labour and BNP: both are actively involved with discrimination. UKIP are more concerned with a withdrawal from the EU.

I’m sorry Mrs T, I thought this was a thread about you (as opposed to the tv programme..)

@Mrs_Teapot wrote:

Didnt you like my thread Terry?

Feeling a bit hurt now :?

What thread??