[ubermik]

The problem with that tho is this PB

Scenario one, man walks through door, lets it shut in the face of woman walking behind him

Conclusions, he is an embittered woman hating child molesting woman beating perv who fancied his mummy, cant maintain relationships and is “equiped” like a horse……… a sea horse tho unfortunately and his only sex life is masturbation because nobody will date him

Scenario two, and “independant” woman lets the door shut in the oppressive mysoginist oggling her from behind as she walks through it hitting him in his learing surveying arrogant face

Conclusions, she is an independant woman who demands equality and who doesnt need to feel indebted to or inferior to “mere men” and refuses to be oppressed any futher by malekind and made to feel she ought to hold the door open for a mere neanderthol woman battering rapist (courtesy of the feminist DICKtionary definition of “Male” and when the door hit him she scored a point for the “sisterhood” as payback for the eons that women had been treated like slaves or second class citizens or baby making machines by apeish unevolved men, her only sex life is masturbation because she is an “empowered woman” who is in total control of her life and has realised that a vibrator doesnt have any of the “drawbacks” lowly man has

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: (not quite a “serious diction, but also not entirely humour :wink: )

Welcome to the feminist world lol :lol:

Back in the real world tho,

the man was just as likely to have been totally unaware of the woman as he was in deep thought trying to remember what he had actually come here to buy, and even if he HAD been vaguely aware of a “person” walking behind him would have thought it inefficient to stop and wait for them, or could have been in a hurry or could simply have assumed they would be EQUALLY as capable of opening the door as he was

the woman? Well some people will buy into just about anything really lol, and woman of that ilk which arent nearly as much of a rareity as they should be have such an amassed collection of issues and tainted perspectives they are a psychologists wet dream

Back to seriousness tho PB, thats actually the point, “chivalry” is a concept founded on the assumption that women are weak, frail and are in some way to be revered, protected, helped and coddled as a result of their fragile feebleness

Fussed around as tho they are a combination of an arrogant expectational princess and a naive child lacking in common sense and ability therefore NEEDED big strong chivalrous men to help the poor dears through an average day

Now admittedly there ARE some women like that, but hopefully they are a dying breed or will soon die off because nobody with any self respect will breed with them thus perpetuating their patheticness lol

MEN specifically doing things for WOMEN like opening doors and pulling out chairs without the same thing being done in return by women is a glimpse of days gone by (good riddence) where the other side of that coin was the women knew their “place” and were “womanly” in the sense that sex happened when the man wanted it, the woman did all the cooking, child rearing, house work and similar “lady chores”, where the man had the final say and the woman followed his leadership pretty much unquestioningly

That was the exchange, frail dull subservience for princess treatment and chivalry amongst other things, the moment women realised it was a crap deal and started to act more like actual people they also broke the deal and with it chivalry should have died off too and been replaced with an EQUAL and MUTUAL level of common decency in BOTH directions

[ubermik]

@drivel wrote:

Thank you fatass for your personally slanted reply

I’m sure your kids would learn a lot more about life and respect if YOU were there to show them

Forget about the possession culture – be with your family as much as you can

They soon leave you !!

The 60’s are over, hippies should be made extinct

At which point, and usually by the exact same people thos parents IF they did that would then be labelled scrounging good for nothing baby factories so they cant really win can they?

Life is rarely about extremes, “working” is niether good or bad, that depends on how many hours someone works, how welll it fits in AROUND their kids rather than the other way round and how much energy it leaves them for being a parent when not at work

Similarly many stay at home parents are just useless parents, and are therefore a bad influence and THEIR kids will turn out better the LESS time they spend around them

But as with most social issues balance is best, there are benefits to a parent working in terms of self respect, social diversity, life experience and example setting to name just a few. All of which can be totally wiped out tho if a career takes too much time and energy from the person and eats into their parenting

Similarly there are downsides to having TOO much time with kids for different people, some of which are complacency, being too easy going, making the kid smoothered and spoilt which they then expect to ALWAYS be the case, lack of lfe experience and diversity and many others

So a balance of the two where niether is approaching a negative excess is, I reckon the best balance for parent AND child and NOT one or the other

[ubermik]

@Dibb’s wrote:

@forumhostpb wrote:

It is somewhat ironic that the revered and saintly Nelson Mandela was imprisoned for advocating the indiscriminate slaughter of white folks – a view that he steadfastly refused to change during many many years of incarceration.

I therefore find it strange that he is feted worldwide for his peaceable views and is hailed as a symbol of moderation.

Some people have very short (or convenient) memories don’t they?

The price of Bronze is very high on the scrap market, I trust the rightous will therefore do what needs to be done, Fancy bunging him next to Churchill fgs………..Some fool in the EU will want Hitler placed their next for his outstanding services during WWII

(It just get’s better)

Stick Hindley & Brady there as well I say!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!……….Make them with more copper in them and they will turn green quicker

(Rant over)

But the place the statue has been (wrongly) placed is, as far as I know one reserved for statues of powerful, noteworthy and effective leaders

So would hitler be out of place there I wonder? Hitler turned a financially crippled forlorn country around and all but for a few silly tactical errors almost invaded and controlled all of europe, a feat not seen in centuries

Not only did his leadership turn around a lost country and re-unite its people into a proud race once again but it managed to steer them into a driven goal of domination with a staunch and dedicated resolve that very few leaders would even be able to achieve

The fact we might not agree with his political or social beliefs doesnt in itself mean he wasnt a good leader, infact his indisputeable accomplishments in the arena of “leadership” far outstrip the comparatively mediocre contributions by the terrorist and racist mandela

Because at the end of the day we, and our government are viewed in no different a way to how many here view and viewed hitler by iraqis, afghanis, iranians and the populations of many countries in the middle east alone and are guilty either directly or indirectly of many acts on a similar level underpinned by equally intolerant views

Infact we, the british invented the concentration camp in the boer (sp??) war, we also allowed the nazi concentration camps to function unninterrupted for nearly three years after we knew of their setting up when we could easily have bombed them or even publicised their existence, but instead we did nothing and denied knowing about them for strategic reasons at Churchills direct instructions

So would hitler REALLY be out of place on the same forum as churchill and mandela? Seems to me they have far more in common than many would like to admit or accept

Plus, the main reason hitler is seen as such an evil person is because of thr “holocaust”, well two points there. Firstly the figures were I reckon vastly over exagerated for effect anyway and if the had been acurate there wouldnt have been any european jews left alive to instantly populate israel after the war as more were killed “allegedly” than were actually in europe to begin with and STILL a couple of million were miraculously alive after the war but with stories of the “camps” that not only contradict each other, but in some clearly documented cases actually contradict themselves

Secondly, america has been directly responsible for or indirectly the cause of over 4 times the amount of innocent deaths in conflicts they have caused around the world in countries that dont concern them since WW2, yet thats pretty much ignored for some strange reason

So it seems you can pretty much carry on being a “good guy” if the only people you kill are blacks, asians or plain old vanilla whiteys by the score

But kill a few jews and lordy lordy lordy youre the devil incarnate for eternity lol

Did I imagine the word “consistency” or does it really exist? lol :lol:

[ubermik]

Carpets to lay, rugs to hoover, theres no rest for the saintly innocent folksies such as moi :D

Guess I should get a shifty on then, so in the immaterial words of speedy gonzalez the cartoon mouse, “underlay underlay, a rubber, a rubber” :D:D

[ubermik]

@johnboy25 wrote:

Nope, infact I don’t know of any kidnapper. And I emphasise the word ANY. And I doubt team McCann do either.

So basically you dont KNOW of the existance of a kidnapper who took Maddy then, so there might not be anyone else involved but her parents and you dont KNOW otherwise

So as I have been saying since the start, its JUST as much of a possibility that her parents bumped her off as it is someone else has because no possibility on either side of the fence is KNOWN, and until that IS the case all of them are equally possible which is pretty indisputeable seeing as nobody on here KNOWS any better

[ubermik]

@fastcars wrote:

@johnboy25 wrote:

I read on sky text that another appeal has been made to the ‘kidnapper’. This is presumably the mysterious kidnapper who lurks in the shadows and strikes without being seen or heard.

Do u know of another kidnapper? And I emphasise the word KNOW.

Do u know of THAT kidnapper? And I ALSO emphasise the word KNOW. :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

Well I’d probably hang some tinsel on it at the very least

[ubermik]

@sweetass wrote:

I guess the poor barstud who had to ‘go up’ there never went down well on his wife when he got home either….. Do doctors get therapy for trauma :wink: :wink: :?: Joke Rubes me ole mucker xxxx

They do however have unlimited access to an endless supply of happy pills tho

Which is probably needed after all those years at university thinking they were going to end up being a doctor only to find its just a glorified orifice job they ended up with :lol:

[ubermik]

@sharongooner wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

As much as I dont agree with it I think vigilanties are the only short term answer to our crime and social misconduct problems

The only downside is that if someone murdered someone and was then just beaten up as a punishment, lets say to the extent of having shattered knee caps as that would seem a reasonable punishment then the chances are our criminal ass kissing excuse for a legal system would probably give the vigilante the longer sentence

I’m sure if rather than notifying the police the residents of an area beat the yobbish scumbags to the point of hospitalisation for antisocial behaviour with the promise of repeat occurences they would magically learn how to behave as if by magic lol

Giving someone a good beating is not a public humiliation in the same way.

They could still be tied to a lampost nekkid afterwards tho lol, theres nothing in the rules to say they couldnt be ;)

[ubermik]

As much as I dont agree with it I think vigilanties are the only short term answer to our crime and social misconduct problems

The only downside is that if someone murdered someone and was then just beaten up as a punishment, lets say to the extent of having shattered knee caps as that would seem a reasonable punishment then the chances are our criminal ass kissing excuse for a legal system would probably give the vigilante the longer sentence

I’m sure if rather than notifying the police the residents of an area beat the yobbish scumbags to the point of hospitalisation for antisocial behaviour with the promise of repeat occurences they would magically learn how to behave as if by magic lol

[Author]

Posts