-
Posts
-
Grow up the lot of you especially moosey…………
I keep wondering what I’m missing.
Post after post attacking Ms M, singling her out as the chief victim and often referring to her as an ar*ehole.
I’ve rarely seen any post by Ms M attacking you Q, for quite some time. I think she’s ignoring you as a pathetic fool – she has some means of blocking you out, and I only wish she would give me the secret.
When did she last attack you, you poor little man, though you probably regard someone who pays not the slightest attention to you as being offensive?
Please give evidence, together with dates.
Are you just one of those schoolyard cowards who pick on girls?
Do I need to ask?
You are one of those schoolyard bullies who are so cowardly that they pick on girls, thinking that girls are weak.
I always make a point of not interfering in the threads here in which women attack one another – it’s for them, not me. Also i try as hard as possible not to attack women at all on these threads. It doesn’t seem right to me. Also, in my experience, if you do attack them, they come back and their fingernails cut deep. Just saying.
So I would thank Ms M for ignoring you if I were you, you cowardly failure of a bully.
1 member liked this post.
Oh Dear Lord ! Is he still at it ? !! I’ve no idea what his problem is with me, Yes I started a thread asking Martin to intervene about ‘ the amount’ of flooding with pointless threads, but I’m hardly the only one to complain about it !! Far from it. I haven’t responded or even read any of his threads for weeks now. He does seem to have an issue with women tho, me, Jamie, Kenty, Linda , Gemma ( Dem ), Angelbabe, Bellevue, mainly me tho for some reason. Apparently I attacked him when he first joined, I have no recollection, I’m not in the habit of attacking people, I don’t think anyone else thinks I attack people ?? I will disagree if I see fit, surely that’s just having an opinion ? Oh !!! Maybe that’s it !! Anyone who disagrees with his opinion is ‘ attacking him’. What an odd bloke !!!
Anyway he can say what he likes, I don’t see it and it doesn’t bother me one iota. Thanks Scep tho, I won’t ‘like’ your post tho as it upsets him.
2 members liked this post.
Is constantly attacking someone, bringing their name into things they have nothing to do with, calling them names, insinuating things about them, well is that Trolling ? Where is Hugs when you need him ?
Oh and Scep, I’m sorry but you’ll get some more ‘arselicking’ insults off him now, when actually you’ve only made an observation, as you know he doesn’t actually bother me one bit. Sorry about that !!
Hugs is banned and rightly so , the old weasel was spotted slithering off to Scotland yard with a file entitled Martin has ruined my life clutching a noose.
I’m not sure Q targets women and have never subscribed to this female victim status belief perpetuated by a few on here – gender is irrelevant yet whenever a male argues with a female its due to them “targeting women” which is normally mentioned by the proverbial white knight coming to the rescue in society. Apart from physical violence due to women being physically weaker , women should be treated the same as men.. they arent children. Scepticals comment for eg of “Also i try as hard as possible not to attack women at all on these threads. It doesn’t seem right to me ” is bizarre . Women want to be regarded as equals or should do, not patronised with a view of if the person is female I will shuffle off into a corner scared to offend them. Who cares what gender someone is , it’s not a dating site.
I agree however that Q is a complete imbecile but he targets males as well Sceptical such as Ge , milky and me. Last time I checked I had a large swinging phallus down below not conforming to a female so don’t know where you get the female victim status from as Q just rolls around screaming with laughter in every thread- as you said in the other thread its spam and posts are lost . In any event time Q was banned like old bugs and winks IMO.
-
This reply was modified 5 years, 7 months ago by
QuintessentialParadox.
1 member liked this post.
QP, I completely agree with your post. I am no ones victim, least of all that bloody moron, but I think Scep is just from a different environment and possibly a different generation to you, its not a smarmy thing, its more than likely the way he was brought up to respect women, not necessarily to just agree with them willy nilly. Yes Q has made remarks about you and Ge, as I said mainly anyone who voices as opinion on his many many threads,but he does hold some sort of grievances to women, from the room who rarely post, they also are attacked by him, called names etc, this from a loony telling people to ignore haters and move on, in the next breath they are arse lickers and worse. Scep and I have had some blistering arguments on these boards over the years so he certainly isn’t afraid to cross females, I think he is more baffled by Q’s behaviour than anything else, well lets face it he baffles most people, I’m pretty sure there are some ‘issues ‘ there, but hey that’s none of my business , I’ll just continue to ignore it.
1 member liked this post.
Take a breather yous may cause yourselves a mischief
Oh the IRONY….
1 member liked this post.
Ambassador , not every thread has to involve you ? have a little rest, re-charge your batteries….. there’s a good lad.
The more recent Morg-Mizzy saga has somewhat taken the wind out of Qs sail which is why his posts are even more snarly and aggressive than usual. I stand by what I said, Q will up the ante now in order to get the same reaction, whereas previously his passive aggrressive approach worked just fine. That’s the boards for you though isn’t it, gobsh*tes like me are wrongly assumed to be the ‘main’ protangonists’ while “just having a RAFL” Q was given a free ride and often given the benefit of the doubt.
Moose has asked him to piss off targetting her because he is now making her feel really uncomfortable yet he keeps waffling on about some unknown random event years ago as his justification now to constantly harrass her. I don’t buy into “he’s just a harmless chatter” and never have although he was never as angry previously (outwardly) as he is now. I also agree that it is based on gender because of the ammount of women he has personal issues with, it can’t be coincidence.
I think Rose was right in one of her recent posts, due to lack of moderation on the boards we have to the responsibility to moderate ourselves and I know recently, I have and I have toned it down. I also know the likes of Q never will, it is their self awarded “victim status” that ensures they will never alter their approach, nor can.
3 members liked this post.
-
This reply was modified 5 years, 7 months ago by
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!