-_-

It would explain his bizzare reaction to Castro’s death. If I had to choose a conspiracy theory to believe it would be this one.

But it’s more his policies that will make him very unpopular, such as a massive increace in fuel tax in a country where you have to drive for hundreds of miles to get to the next city, which will make travel very…[Read more]

It sounds like litterally every human who has ever lived to me.

I don’t find them offensive, but I also don’t understand why they are sold still. Who is buying them?

But why do they offend you as an idividual specifically? You didn’t actually state a reason, other than that slavery affected people, and that may or may not be related to golliwogs somehow.

I don’t find them offensive, but I also don’t understand why they are sold still. Who is buying them?

But why do they offend you specifically? You didn’t actually state a reason, other than that slavery affected people, and that may or may not be related to gollywogs somehow.

I don’t find them offensive, but I also don’t understand why they are sold still. Who is buying them?

But why are you offended? You didn’t actually state a reason.

I don’t find them offensive, but I also don’t understand why they are sold still. Who is buying them?

Yeah … I don’t think politial correctness is why we ended slavery.

But why are you offended? You didn’t actually state a reason.

What do you propose to do with muslims who are British (or your native country’s) citizens?

What do you propose to do with muslims who are British citizens?

With 32 entities, many of which are part of Britain, and the others are mostly poor countries who are not going to buy anything that Britain exports (Cars, Aerospace components, ect).

Yes, the EU is terrible at making trade deals, that’s why I don’t want to be in the customs union. While it might still take awhile to negotiate on our own, it…[Read more]

The EU has active trade deals with 32 entities (including countries in the EFTA and EEA), not 161. Even then, several of those are British crown dependancies (Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Akrotiri and Dhekelia). The WTO has no authority over these deals anyway, its up to the entities that negotiated those deals if they want to apply the same…[Read more]

The EU has active trade deals with 32 entities (including countries in the EFTA and EEA), not 161. Even then, several of those are British crown dependancies (Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Akrotiri and Dhekelia). The WTO has no authority over these deals anyway, its up to the entities that negotiated those deals if they want to apply the same…[Read more]

Their opt-outs are also thought of as being temporary by the EU.

What changes would you propose making, and how would you elect someone to make those changes? (You can’t)

I don’t really care if there is a European state or not, I just don’t think Britain should be part of it for the reasons I explained in my last post.

I think you will…[Read more]

The posibility that this can even happen is the problem I was trying to explain, parliment isn’t sovereign if it can be bound by the ECJ.

It was never intended to be this way though, our opt-out of the Euro and Schengen was always seen as temporary by the EU establishment. They will eventually try to force us to change if we were to remain…[Read more]

I know the history of the constitution, I was refering specifically to the 1689 Bill of Rights and the Magna Carta, both of which are completely ignored by a lot of the laws we have.

I strongly disagree with you that parliment didn’t give up sovereignty to the EU, EU law overrides British law wherever there is a conflict as the European Court of…[Read more]

The constitution states that parliament must always be sovereign. This is clearly isn’t the case with EU membership, and so is unconstitutional.

But let’s not pretend that the constitution is actually ever applied. This isn’t an area I know a lot about, but even I know of a few laws that directly contradict what the constitutional documents say.

The constitution states that parliament must always be sovereign. This is clearly isn’t the case with EU membership, and so is unconstitutional.

But let’s not pretend that the constitution is actually ever applied, it grants the right to bear arms (with less restrictions than our actual laws place), and to free speech (which is restricted by…[Read more]

Funny that, they didn’t care about our non-existant constitution when we joined the EU/EC.

Meh

Meh

Labour is dead, i’ve been saying this for a few months now.

Parliment voted to to trigger article 50 by March at the very latest, 461 to 89. I don’t see any reason for the government to be worried, it has legitimacy from both the referendum and parliment now.