Artful Dodger

Another example is when Archimedes jumped out of the bath and ran naked down the road shouting..’Eureka’……2 facts connected in his brain and gave him the answer he was seeking.

Thing is about question 1,2,3 and Orson’s add on is that a maths riddle or logic riddle, or like follows a sequence. Sequences are interesting in the sense that one has to see the first connection that connects 2 facts in your brain. Once you have made a connection in the item presented, every thing soon falls into place. So the formula to work…[Read more]

It’s in the vowels

Ha Ha! Glad to see you got new tablet. Awesome indeed! I use a P.C  most of the time but my tablet is great when i want to go into my lounge or in my kitchen and listen to music. I even use it when i’m having a bath although i do stress to any one (under health and safety measures) to keep it well away from the bath. I put it outside the door to…[Read more]

That’s one complex family tree. LOL

The man in the picture is his son. Since he doesn’t have any brothers or sisters, the statement…My Father’s son is himself. A shortened version would be, This Man’s father is my self, so he is the father of the bones referred to in the riddle. they are his son.

It’s one of those questions which is very hard to juggle around in your head while one tries to work it out.

ok…that man’s father and my father’s son are the same. No brothers or sisters so my Father’s son and me are separate people. So no brothers or sisters then my father’s son can only be me.

Clarification….That Man is my son. If i have no brothers or sisters then my fathers son can only be me…which means I (me) am that man’s father.

ok…that man’s father and my father’s son are the same. No brothers or sisters so my Father’s son and me are separate people. So no brothers or sisters then my father’s son can only be me.

Clarification….That Man is my son. If i have no brothers or sisters then my fathers son can only be me…which means I (me) an that man’s father.

Ok thanks for confirming. Always helps to know exactly the situation and that it has a definite answer. Just making sure it wasn’t a trick question.

First of all..is the cloaked figure actually standing on the bridge blocking it? as it states that he is in the center of the pass which does not necessarily imply he’s on the bridge at all so the man can just ignore his question and cross the bridge.

While the hooded figure could quite possibly be a fan of necrophilia,it distracts from the question he’s asking…..

Well, lets dismiss the donkey to begin with. LOL

The woman gets 70.00 pounds worth of free clothes and 30.00 in money costing the owner of the shop 100.00.

Or 100.00 the lady steals 100 so the owner is down 100. She then buys 70.. pounds worth, giving back 70.00 pounds but now has 70.00 worth of clothes. So in reality the owner at this point has lost 70.00 pounds in clothes as he has received 70.00 pounds back of his own money. Because he gives her 30.00 change as  ell he has lost 100 pounds altogether

I would say 200

Great post mafia.

Enjoy your free drink!

next you would add 13…then you would times that number by 15

It is a succession of adding then multiplying prime numbers