Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
15 November, 2006 at 1:09 am #248216
Oh they would just think you are a demented lunatic, same as you ever were.
12 November, 2006 at 2:10 pm #248205@artful_dodgers_sly_hand wrote:
Most of you people only think you know what the BNP is about and thats because you have been told so by some other party. Read the manifesto for yourself and then decide. just stop being puppets of todays f*cked up society.
in the last 30 years crime has risen by over 1500 per cent.
Violent crime by more.
sexual crime even more.
fraud up by 7000 per cent.
all in the last 30 years.mass immigration has been happening for the last 30 years.
coincidence?
you decide.
Wow! That sounds so like Emma that it must be her brother! Coincidence? You decide! :) I hope she hasn’t just made up another name to make us think there are TWO BNP supporters on JC!! Next we’ll be hearing about the 100% increase in support for the BNP I suppose. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
4 November, 2006 at 3:27 pm #243613@geoff wrote:
leave the bully’s to wave their flags and call you a freak …
as people have been saying to console Geoff’s many victims over the years.
3 November, 2006 at 4:46 pm #247111@emmalush wrote:
You are missing the point. What Nick said to those who wanted to hear what he had to say, did in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM cause hatred, he is INNOCENT, the crown prosecution know this, new labour know this, and so do every right minded individual on planet earth.
Did you mean on Planet Emma?
3 November, 2006 at 12:05 am #247103@emmalush wrote:
Were you there? Have you seen the prosecution case? Are you on the jury?
Has anyone caused racial hatred due to words spoken by Nick or Mark?The BBC are to applauded for uncovering these scum and passing the footage to the police.
You mean encouraging incitement to racial hatred :wink:So, if the BBC had taped a conversation between two muslim leaders talking about inciting muslims to rise up and start bombing people and they passed this to the police, you would be standing on the courtroom steps with placards campaigning for the case to be dropped and the BBC to be charged with incitement to cause racial hatred? GET A LIFE YOU SAD FUC/K!!
2 November, 2006 at 10:02 pm #247101@emmalush wrote:
This trial is not specifically about Nick and Mark, but about whether you can punish someone for saying something that constitutes “incitement to racial hatred”, exactly what that is, only the crown prosecution and new labour know, when will we find out, we dont know yet. This trial IS specifically about ‘Nick and Mark’ (Dumb and Dumber?). Who else has been charged? I think you’ll find that it’s a criminal charge they face and not a civil ‘class action suit’ so it is nothing to do with rights of Freedom of Speech.
NOT ONE SINGLE individual present in that meeting caused racial hatred through Nick’s words. Therefore it cannot be proven he did wrong. Were you there? Have you seen the prosecution case? Are you on the jury?
What could be proven, is the BBC caused racial hatred by showing the documentary, therefore the BBC editor who gave permission to broadcast it would be up for seven years. The BBC are to applauded for uncovering these scum and passing the footage to the police.Indeed, no one has caused any hatred through this whole saga that we know of. I can name 2 people, 3 if we include you.
Do you understand some of the obsurdity of this trial now? If we can’t understand the reasoning behind any of your other thousands of posts why should we understand this one? Is this the new BNP website?1 November, 2006 at 11:59 pm #247157@wangle wrote:
ive been lookin after the house the past couple of days, He just got a plasma screen the other week so im lookin after it.
Well that’s one less thing for him to worry about :?
14 October, 2006 at 12:58 pm #244326@becky wrote:
What about the WHITE CHRISTIAN woman who works for British Airways who was told to remove her cross on her chain, she refused as its her faith and she was suspended from work for 2 weeks without pay??????????????? Speak sense!
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-13547103,00.html
Here you go have a nose at this maybe you will be lost for words?!?!?!
Another f*cking moronic sh*tstirrer like Emmalush. Where does it say in the Bible that you have to wear a fu*cking cross on a chain around your neck? It’s breaking dress rules which apply equally to all faiths. And she wasn’t suspended, she chose to take unpaid leave. Read your own link you moron.
13 October, 2006 at 8:12 pm #244314Emmalush, I look at all the new topics and see they are nearly all started by you and they are nearly all complete garbage. Your domination of these message boards is embarrassing. Nobody ever agrees with you but you don’t shut up. You are a fuc/king moron.
10 October, 2006 at 7:53 pm #243564@pats wrote:
@bob2go wrote:
@pats wrote:
a bus driver in liverpool asked a muslim woman to lift her veil so he could compare her face with the one on the buss pass she handed him. she refused.he made her pay her fare. he was later reprimanded for doing his job. go figure.
I figure you made this up (and all the people who hoped it was true couldn’t wait to respond).
nope. tis a true story.
It did happen but in Yorkshire, not Liverpool, and in 1997, not 2006. No point dragging it up again just to give the chatroom racists more ammunition, is there?
-
AuthorPosts