Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
WTF? Draculina do you really think a child as young as 14 should be having sexual relations with people or are you so ‘concerned’ with the crime rate ‘coming down’ you would lower the age of consent just so that the figures look more ‘appealing’?
It was a rebutal to when Ge said that European countries with a lower age of consent have a lower reported crime rate than the UK, which has a higher age of consent.
If you were a mother maybe you would feel differently?
I am a mother
Drac, If a 14 year-old girl agrees to sleep with a 60 year old man, or a 40 year old man, or a 20 year old man, it’s still rape, because the girl is below the age of consent. But why should execution be the right penalty, as you advocate on the other thread?? What if a 16 year old slept with the 14 year old? It’s still rape. Why execution Or do you just think that it’s the 60 year-old who should be singled out from treatment?
This thread is about punishment for crimes that you might commit in the future.
Drac, I’ve heard you support the execution of opponents of the Pinochet regime in Chile by throwing them out of helicopters.
That was a joke, that I believe I made in PM
1 member liked this post.
Drac why don’t you put that statement in its context ?
Because you aren’t looking at the bigger picture.
Once you give the state power to punish people for crimes that have not happened, then that power will be applied to all crimes.
There aren’t currently enough prisons in the UK to house all sexual offenders, obviously other avenues need to be explored for dealing with low grade offenders.
Build more prisons, re-instate capital punishment.
p.s. You implied you have a doctorate of some description…? yes ?
I have a PhD in cryptography.
Interesting that you continually spelt penetration as penitration and you can’t spell ‘ psychologically’ or ‘negatively’ , correctly either…. I know its not a spelling B but does seem a tad odd, imho of course.
English isn’t my first language.
Even if it was, I don’t see how my spelling is relevent to the facts I presented.
1 member liked this post.
You stated penetration by something other than a penis was statutory rape,
I made no such statement.
Its not about ‘winning’ its about honest opinion. Honest being the operative word
Ironic
Oh dear Drac, crashed and burned, I’d re-group all of yourselves …… just sayin…
If you don’t want to be intellectually honest, then there is no point continuing this discussion.
I directly quoted the law as written in UK legislation, and proviced links to the original source material.
It is clear to any outside obsever that I am correct, with even the most basic investigation into the material I have posted.
You have no argument against what I have said, you have lost.
I am aware u are speaking of UK law. However, rape, sexual assaults are universal. Law applies in all countries. Every law has definition and terms applied which are very very similar, it the small print you need to read.. plus culture applied as to the sexual consent age also factor..this were the big problem comes in. Consent…then it comes down to verbal he say, she say issue… Evidence then more crucile on deciding in these cases in a court of law…
The law can vary quite considerably, it isn’t even a crime in some countries.
You accused me of supporting sex between 60 year olds and 14 years olds 6 pages ago, there is only one person here who is taking the piss and obviously it is you.
You refused to say it was bad, and are still refusing to.
What other conclusion can I draw from that behaviour?
2 members liked this post.
I know what the law states. I also know you were whining about that same law 3 pages ago.
I was complaining about the law concerning rape.
We are now dicussing the law concerning statutory rape, which is a different crime.
I don’t think you are debating in good faith.
1 member liked this post.
Backtracking again. Why should someone be executed for raping a 14 year old (your logic not mine) but not executed for raping a 15 year old?
They should both be executed.
I don’t give a rats arse about your googled information, 3 pages ago you suggested that same googled information is set up to protect the assailant rather than the victim. Do try and be consistent on these issues.
The legal documents are the legal documents, they speak for themselves
