emmalush

@Slayer wrote:

So there we finally have it- there is no law, there is no compulsion

Guidlines to do what slayer, you still havnt asnswered that yet, cos you know full well it means guidlines to force.

Children are “forced” to go to school every day, are “forced” to take PE, History, Maths etc- things they don’t want to do

What 3 year olds learn…

[Read more]

@James Belfast wrote:

erm..in your heading you dozy cow.

:oops: Wrote the wrong thing there :D Tis child abuse though, so not scraping the barrel, just stating fact.

How about replying to the other points i made, or have you lost the argument and now see sense?

@Pete wrote:

youre inferring the afro caribbeans are the “racists” its bloody stupid officials that are to blame for bloody stupid policies

The afro caribbeans are quite happy to segregate themselves from the rest of society. People get called racists for that, and i take your point too, the LHA are inciting racial hatred, but because they work…[Read more]

@ForumHostPB wrote:

BTW – the lovely and ever fragrant Emma also spouts bollocks most of the time too – and I equally support her right to do so.

She is clearly yet another single issue bigot.

Thanks you fascist :wink:

@James Belfast wrote:

you must be scraping the bottom of several barrels if you try to dress this one up as child abuse.

Where does it say i said that???

Your craftily-worded heading says it all about you – you are evil and arrogant.

You must have a mirror next to your screen :wink:

Never mind trying to pretend to argue over the word ‘may’, why…

[Read more]

she tried to imply that what you wanted was what she said

Thats impossible, because i dont want what she said. She assumed wrongly, and still hasnt appologised, but instead prefers to weive her way out of what she said like a slippery snake.

@Rab wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4983780.stm

The government said Mr Haw posed a potential security risk and described his argument as absurd

Peace = potential security risk, absurd? I rather think so, dont you?

These are the very idiotic people who are running our society.

What are we going to do about it?

Mr Haw’s solicitor…

[Read more]

@Mrs Clean wrote:

Emma, sometimes you have to look on the on light side of life (whistles!)

You tried to imply that i want what you said, then you made out it was a joke, so why the ” :roll: “?

@Mrs Clean wrote:

Hasn’t yet stopped you expressing yourself Emma :?

Very true, but this cannot be right surely?

All he did was legally send pictures and video footgae to “authority”, how is that a criminal offence?

If your grandmother did this, how would you then react, what would you think of blairs regime then?

Evil dictatorship’s start…[Read more]

@Mrs Clean wrote:

@emmalush wrote:

@Mrs Clean wrote:

Yeh Emma send all em all back on the next banana boat :roll:

Thats a rather racist and fascist thing to say.

I was being IRONIC and you know it, don’t try and wind me up Emma, Im past all that :roll:

Ok, its just that i dont see racism and fascist belief in joking terms, unless those who…[Read more]

@Slayer wrote:

“legal” abuse implies legislation

As always with BNP misreporting of facts, there is no suggestion this will become “law”, the Ouseley report will make recommendations for guidelines …

Guidlines to do what?

@token_male wrote:

@emmalush wrote:

Please note the word “MAY” in my title.

Rape MAY become legal!!!!!

But no one is putting that idea forward.

Marxists are putting this idea forward, which is insane.

You dont have to go against me just because token, we can agree that something bad is wrong, and this idea is bad.

@Mrs Clean wrote:

Yeh Emma send all em all back on the next banana boat :roll:

Thats a rather racist and fascist thing to say.

@Pete wrote:

I’d be asking the parents wtf they doing teaching a 3 yr old to discriminate on the grounds of colour or creed

What parent is discriminating on those grounds?

@Artist wrote:

Surely u cant have a 3 year old doing exactly what he or she wants to isnt it the problem in society, that some kids run riot growing up to do exactly as they choose.surely discipline is a healthy part of growing up within reason, obviously.

Of course, but were talking about something that they dont have to do, its not an essential…[Read more]

Squeezy, if a child under these propossed laws refuses to play with another child, what do you think the teacher will do next?

@Squeezy wrote:

And how is this mental and physical abuse??? :roll:

Please note the word “MAY” in my title.

IF a child refuses to do something they dont wana do, as 3 year olds do, what does “have to play together” then mean to you?

@ToMmY-ToXeN wrote:

A true Sikh would never preach hatred.

I bet you can’t find one example of a Sikh preaching hatred or commiting a terrorist attack.

Go on, off you go to google.

Are you saying that YOU know the definition of true sikhism?

I know of a sikh community LEADER who votes BNP. Are you telling us that every single sikh who adheres to…[Read more]

@James Belfast wrote:

Since when was 32 ‘nearly 50’? I bet by next week you’ll be saying it’s nearly 100 seats… :wink:

The BNP won 33 seats on thursday, they already had around 15-20.

@ToMmY-ToXeN wrote:

A true sikh would never preach hatred.

How many sikh’s dont preach hatred to someone somewhere on earth?