Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
So Emma finally admits that if the BNP were to take power then dissidents would be done away with.
Interesting you say that, because the koran says the right hand (the sword hand) can take any woman who is not a muslim, and take her for himself.
But no, if the BNP got into power, you wouldn’t wana live here?
@slayer wrote:
Troops…control our borders….a military state!!!!! ffs
Are you smoking LSD tonight :shock:
There are people here illegaly you idiot…
There are people here illegaly you idiot…
With idiotic statements like yours…i cant believe you support it :roll: Makes sense though, your a tory.
@slayer wrote:
I read about this on Monday- It was reported as a minor news bulletin (if every fight over a weekend that involved a few hundred people was in the news, that’s all you’d read) and nothing else.
How many fights involving 200 hundred people or more occur in a year, let alone any weekend???
You been watching too many films.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
So what you’re now saying is that no money should be spent on solving a crime if an asylum seeker is involved in any way, or if an asylum seeker has any information relating to a crime.
No. Im saying whilst there here, if they can help us solve a crime, great. BUT, successive governments have allowed asylum seekers here, and that is wrong. We should be encouraging them to leave, stopping any getting here from now on by bringing our troops home to control our borders, thus eventually we wont be wasting upto £66 ph on them.
No country NEEDS asylum seekers, it’s just what civilized people do i.e. give a helping hand to the less fortunate.
Do you help all those less fortunate than you?
White youths started it, and they were behaving racist. They should be locked up for ten years. The problem still exists, white, black, asian, muslim, christian etc etc just wont always get on, when they dont, people are murdered, stabbed, beaten up, abused verbally, is this the kind of situation we want to live in?
You cant force people to like something they dont naturally like, whether that be a muslim eating pork, or a white christian converting to islam.
We are not robots.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
The difference between the Greens, Respect, Conservatives, Labour, etc. and the BNP is that the BNP control no local councils, they don’t have a single mayor, and not even 1 MP in the entire country.
Nor do the greens.
Not exactly the voice of the British people are they?
Depends what you mean by voice. As i said, the mainstream media dont wana talk about the BNP, even the right wing Talksport are afraid sometimes. The reason, because theres a perception that everything the BNP stands for is bad.
If im wrong, go find me a substantial amount of BNP policy that is bad. All of you, read some of the BNP manifesto 2005 and tell us what you think of their policy?
Even a monkey was elected into office as a mayor but this is a feat that is beyond the BNP.
A bloke in a monkey suit is not a monkey you idiot.
The truth is that while British people may have concerns about immigration and europe and other issues most people wouldn’t dream of endorsing a neo-nazi organisation.
Most people will vote BNP one day, that day is slowly approaching, and when it happens, i shall be waving goodbye to you.
The ideas are the same, they are just presented differently in a more media savvy way to make the party look less extreme.
Invading a country illegaly and murdering tens of thousands of innocent people is a new labour a new conservatist policy, not BNP.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
when push comes to shove, the decent people of this country will stand up against the BNP
808,200 people voted BNP 2 years ago. It has become very difficult for them to get anywhere, whilst always shunned by media and mainstream political class.
The old gang are scared sheetless of the decency of policy that the BNP have, that decent people want. Whether it was the BNP, or the greens or respect, the old gang parties are too frightened to give them decent air time, and thus combine to stop anyone else getting edgeway.
Checkout the 2005 BNP Manifesto, the majority is what decent people want.
Otherwise, we want more war :(
Its time to stand up for yourself, stop reading the blag line of new labour and their new conservatism buddies via your goggle box. Even namby pamby political commentators were saying wednesday, that Cameron sounds like 1997 blair.
Contact your local BNP branch, go to a meeting, listen and workout for yourself if you agree with some of the most hard working men and women this country has to offer.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Your last post contradicts your entire argument. You say spending money on interpreters is a waste of money but then you say solving crimes is not a waste of money.
Whilst there here, using them to defend decency is ok. BUT, WE DO NOT NEED ASYLUM SEEKERS HERE, so we shouldn’t be spending 1p on ANY of them.
@chathostuk wrote:
Hmmm I don’t really care what folk think about my dislike for the Daily Mail.
Oh no, I guess I just said it. The end of JC is nigh!!!!!!!!!!!
You didnt understand what i said.
It is the percieved version in PC britain, to assume right wing as “racist”.
By agreeing with the daily mail, people will assume you are “racist”.
So, by “dissing” them, people will think you are a nice man.
The daily mail via thisislondon wrote a truth, you obviously do not subscribe to all truths. You would rather bury your head in the sand, than admit that the “racist” daily mail is correct.
@chathostuk wrote:
How did I guess this would be an article from the Daily Mail before even opening the thread?!? :roll:
Because you dont believe in telling all truths? Because you prefer to hide away from the realities of our disastorous government policy? You want folk to think your not “racist” by kind of condeming a “right wing” newspaper? (not good for business…) :wink:
You may have thought it was thisislondon.co.uk http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23369243-details/Damning+police+report+shows+illegal+workers+cost+UK+%C2%A33bn+tax/article.do
