Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
23 February, 2008 at 7:08 pm #165409
@pats wrote:
@fastcars wrote:
@sharongooner wrote:
@fastcars wrote:
Hair Of The Dog… :)
does that actually work?
Well I feel tickety boo now so I guess so .. 8)
glad u do……… :-…
Lightweight…. :-
23 February, 2008 at 6:57 pm #165406@sharongooner wrote:
@fastcars wrote:
Hair Of The Dog… :)
does that actually work?
Well I feel tickety boo now so I guess so .. 8)
23 February, 2008 at 6:53 pm #165404Hair Of The Dog… :)
23 February, 2008 at 4:23 pm #122102@~*Lucky*~ wrote:
@fastcars wrote:
@~*Lucky*~ wrote:
Congrats Kenty xx
Finding my wedding dress def made me smile, although have decided to hang fire from buying it at mo and to try on some more… know I want that one tho :lol:
Is it possible to bring your wedding date forward… :?:
now now Fastcars, if you start your nonsense I will personally email and pm you with a daily update :lol: :lol: :lol:
8) :wink:
23 February, 2008 at 4:17 pm #122100@~*Lucky*~ wrote:
Congrats Kenty xx
Finding my wedding dress def made me smile, although have decided to hang fire from buying it at mo and to try on some more… know I want that one tho :lol:
Is it possible to bring your wedding date forward… :?:
23 February, 2008 at 3:55 pm #313580@bat wrote:
@slayer wrote:
But isnt the point these 2 murderers werent on it voluntarily but were identified due to other crimes committed
The London model murder is a prime example- 2 years after she was killed, the police were no nearer finding her killer but they had some DNA- Mark Dixie then gets into a pub fight, is arrested and suddenly you have a matching DNA ID.
Without the police recording DNA following an arrest, this murderer would STILL be free.
Exactly. Having a national DNA database can only be a good thing. The only ones who have anything to fear from it are the criminals.
And the vigilantes…..
23 February, 2008 at 3:52 pm #122098Nothing yet….. my heads still banging… :-…
22 February, 2008 at 8:13 pm #313766@sunny wrote:
I aint heard any 1 say more then nore better then
Thats worser than any fink that is
:lol: :lol: God I love you… 8) :lol:
22 February, 2008 at 12:09 pm #279414@pats wrote:
THE BRIT AWARDS………a few clips from last nights show. amy winehouse was awesome…..terrific set by mark ronson……wet me knickers at gary barlow and david tennant :P :P :oops: :P mika was class……an omg i’m turning into sunny..is rihanna sha/ggable or what!! =P~ kylie is okayish……arctic monkeys pissed as coonts lol but well deserved win…..loved sharon osbourne tellin vic reeves to pi/ss off you drunken bas/tard.when he messed up his intro :lol: adele is gonna be big(well bigger than she already is :wink: ) this year. only bu/m note……sharonnnnnnnnnnnnnn…….ffs where does kelly get her dress sense :shock: :shock: certainly not from her mother!!!!ozzy rocks!!!!!!!……….and of course for sgt pepper…the grt paul mcartney closing the show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_puCZQ6Z3xs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfbZW_WY1iw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfZcNcx2LZs
Amy Winehouse has made some fantastic studio recordings…. but live… :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: WHAT A MESS!!
22 February, 2008 at 9:06 am #313486@emmalush wrote:
@fastcars wrote:
Number of competitive sports played…… Hundereds
Winners from Leicester…… 1
Its not about being the WINNER at a touranament, its about overall success.
I’ll spell it out as i expect another faulty reply.
City X comes second in all ten comps.
City Z win one and finishes last in 9.
City X is the best sporting city. Understand?
Surely manchester, london or birmingham has better sporting success?
If so, is it better to population % of Leicester which only has 750,000 occupents?
So what did you come 2nd in…. :?:
-
AuthorPosts
