Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Draculina wrote:
”As far as I can tell people in this thread are deliberately misinterpreting the law as a justification for their view that sex with a child 14-16 is acceptable.”
Sorry, I haven’t seen that at all !! Quite the opposite actually. Could you direct me to such comments ?
painoying
Drac…… Actually you did say that…..
Ge wrote:
They aren’t a different crime in certain circumstances though are they. or are you suggesting vaginal penetration with a bottle is a lesser crime than one carried out by a penis?
Draculina wrote:
Different Crimes
Ge wrote:
Explain how it is a different crime, 3 pages ago you complained the law is set up to protect the assailant and not the victim.
Ge wrote:Explain how it is a different crime, 3 pages ago you complained the law is set up to protect the assailant and not the victim. Do you ever stick to one view or do you change it frequently like most people change their underwear?
Draculina wrote:
One is punishable as stautory rape under the Sexual Offences Act 2003
And Dr Drac, you misspelt statutory
Once again, Have a Nice Day
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by mooosey88.
Drac why don’t you put that statement in its context ?
Ge said ” The scheme in Germany is voluntary and the clients identity is anonymous and protected by law. Paedophilia is classified as a mental illness suggesting treatment is possible and of course treatment is cheaper than the trauma the victims go through and cheaper than locking up the actual paedophile after an offense has been committed. All emotion aside, it makes perfect economic sense.”
I’m pleased though, that you are worried about the rights of citizens …
Ge wrote:
So your not qualified to give an opinion whether treatment is suitable, or not.
Draculina wrote:
You can psychologicaly condition people to react negitively to certain stimuli, this isn’t something the British state should be doing to it’s citizens.
Ge wrote:There aren’t currently enough prisons in the UK to house all sexual offenders, obviously other avenues need to be explored for dealing with low grade offenders.
Draculina wrote:
Execution
Yep … Citizen Smith just wants to execute em …… and dust her hands off ….. next problem please ….
p.s. You implied you have a doctorate of some description…? yes ?
Interesting that you continually spelt penetration as penitration and you can’t spell ‘ psychologically’ or ‘negatively’ , correctly either…. I know its not a spelling B but does seem a tad odd, imho of course.
1 member liked this post.
No dear, I just went to bed like normal people do…..
Anyone can google ‘ Laws and Acts’ and post them as links as back up, however you failed to correlate them with your statements. You stated penetration by something other than a penis was statutory rape, It isn’t and would not be charged as such. Its not about ‘winning’ its about honest opinion. Honest being the operative word, not fudging stats and such to fit, or trying to imply people are ‘something abhorrent ‘ because they choose not to answer deliberately misleading questions. When you did that you lost….IMHO of course.
Have a nice day
Oh dear Drac, crashed and burned, I’d re-group all of yourselves …… just sayin…
well that makes no sense …. I thought she was bright
I think you’ll find raping someone with a bottle would not be seen as statutory rape after all you said its a different crime, it would be seen as serious sexual assault and can carry stronger sentences than rape crime depending on the circumstances
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by
