Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Disagree I’m afraid. He says repeatedly that the jokes are used and how he worked them out and why some don’t work etc , I mean obviously comedians doing a live tour for 18 months will have to have some structure, he also explains all that as well, they don’t just go on stage and make up stuff for 3 hours !! But dealing with a live audience and changing politics etc over 18 months means you have to have a certain amount of spontaneity when doing observational comedy, unlike comedians who literally just spout lame jokes out one after the other. I’ve seen Bill Hicks, there is a similarity and I’m sure all comedians will use / alter ideas from others but I’d hardly say he copies him, that sounds derogatory. He has spontaneity all decent comics have to be naturally funny and quick witted.
Actually , having watched that on the road clip again its not nearly as funny as the live tour… it was a bit contrived the live tour is far funnier and more spontaneous in my opinion
I love Stewart Lee, watched ‘Content Provider ‘ on iPlayer and was howling, he’s a clever man, the novel section was funny as was the remain / leave section. Really funny all of it, well I thought so.
1 member liked this post.
Erm …. I could be wrong, but I don’t think Rose has been banned Hugs ….
ne mind, better luck next time
2 members liked this post.
” I also said I thought Martin probably yawns a lot after receiving so many emails from you whinging about this one and that one. Well who wouldn’t, you have no idea how much work it takes to scroll through a load of boring text simply because some sad old fart decides 95% of a Chatroom are trolls !”
Class hahahaha2 members liked this post.
”There was evidence of trolling by Rose and this would not have happened if your Milky had not resurected an old thread on the boards.”
As Mr Q would say LMAO !!
Why shouldn’t he resurrect an old thread ?
Is it because it made you look silly ? tsk….. People can post on any thread they wish to…. after all ‘that’s what they are there for ‘ innit
Perfectly clear and understandable
1 member liked this post.
Oh Right !!! Glad that is all cleared up then …….. So when you said :
”Still posting his moronic posts on the boards maybe it is time for him to be banned from them.
You have my vote it someone wants to start a petition.”
what you meant was he had been ‘trolling’ in room 2, and that actually it is fine for him to post on the boards as much as he likes because as you also said ”that’s what they are there for”
Fancy that, Mr Q trolling people in room 2 eh, well as annoying as some people find Mr Q’s posts I’m shocked anyone would think he is a Troll, deeply deeply shocked. Tut tut Mr Q ! On the plus side tho Q Welcome to the Gang !! Here, have a badge !
Thanks Hugs for erm explaining that
Can you stop typing garbage and answer the question ? Why the U turn regarding Mr Q ? Why campaign for him posting as much as he likes because in your words
” that is what the boards are for ” then say
”
Still posting his moronic posts on the boards maybe it is time for him to be banned from them.
You have my vote it someone wants to start a petition.”
Can you explain that please ?
Also can you be more careful in how you quote please
mooosey88 wrote:
Please inform Rose it is pointless trolling sairs73 on the boards as she is already banned and so is unable to reply to it. Then again if she had bothered to actually read the posts then she would have realised it was an out of date thread.” Mooosey wrote no such thing !!
“Yes I reported the thread to Martin and yes it was removed not because of your attempt to troll me but for the trolling by Rose”
Funny you don’t say , not because of your attempt to troll me but by the trolling by Rose of Sairs73 ??
A very ambiguous statement. Anyway the thread has gone and most sensible people know why …. Are you going to explain your new feelings about Mr Q ?
