Morgan.

Greed is a sin.

Same

Isn’t that more or less self indulgence? isn’t that a sin?

The injuries are consistent with my Option B.

The Turin shroud is either;

Option A, a total freak, one off freak. We have all seen a cloud that has a face in it. A funny shaped leaf, that looks like a face, I have seen a face in steam on a window. The ancients looked up in the sky and saw hunters, bears and dogs, and all sorts of things amongst the stars. Occasionally a carrot look just a…[Read more]

No, in JC

It is not possible to discuss, let alone discuss civilly, with someone whilst the sanctimonious and pious are envisioning angels, hearing the clarions, the dervishes are whirring away and the mantra has become droningly monotonous. Ah, you’ve finally taken a break from banging your head against the wall and reciting huge swathes of Timothy and…[Read more]

Mathew, Mark, Luke and John, all went to bed with their trousers on.

Do you know who they were? what they supposedly said? who they supposedly said it to? Do you know what they supposedly did? who they supposedly did it to? How does it affect your life today?

Peter and Paul, fly away Peter, fly away Paul.

Mustn’t forget nice but dim…[Read more]

For every Christian scientist, you will find 99 non Christian scientists.

Dont be ridiculous. Firstly, he never had a “branch” of Science, he had several.

Maths, Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Astro-Physics, Cosmology, just for starters

If your statement is correct, that would mean that Darwin didn’t establish his own branch of Science, ie, Evolution, Evolutionary Biology, into the popular imagination.

If Darwin…[Read more]

It’s all a load of bollox !

What a load of bollox

Alternately,

Stephen Hawking wrote the best ever Cosmology for Dummies book 😀 Dummies in their millions all over the world read and bought it. Some of those are no longer dummies.

Cosmology for Dummies 😀

What Stephen Hawking’s great legacy is, is that he was the greatest communicator of his day, in his field. He was able to bring the very complex world of Cosmology, Astronomy, Astro- Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Space and Time, and many other branches of Science, into quite simplistic layman’s terms. With his best seller A Brief History of Time, he…[Read more]

Back to Music theory :)

Music evolves like everything does. Bach stamped his DNA in music. Every generation after Bach carries his influence, sometimes it’s obvious sometimes it’s not so obvious. The influence will diminsh with generations, yet always remain. All the giants of Music stamp their musical DNA upon the next generations developement.…[Read more]

It is of course possible and probable, that MrQ’s association between Sarstedt’s song and Bach is not of a musical nature but more of an emotional or sensorial association. This does seem more likely, especially as MrQ’s music theory is probably quite limited.

The power of association is an amazing feature of the mind. Maybe when MrQ listens to…[Read more]

I think MrQ’s connection between the song and Bach is Sarstedt’s use of arpeggios and implied arpeggios, which are Bach like. Bach’s music is very much built on the use of arpeggios as is a lot of Classical music. Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata is a good example of arpeggios in music.

It’s very probable that the distinct chord sequence of the…[Read more]