Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
2 June, 2012 at 4:43 pm #498073
I’ve given up trying to understand Tom. After all, it is impossible to comprehend the incomprehensible.
2 June, 2012 at 4:30 pm #498071@wordsworth60 wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
Tsk Words. Van Gough is related to Darren Gough. Van is Darren’s secret love child. Van is called Van because his mother is from the House of Morrison. :P
I didn’t think Morrisons did deliveries . . .
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
They don’t. It’s a real bug bear of mine. Still, with summer here, bamboo furniture is in abundance. :P
2 June, 2012 at 4:25 pm #497974@tom wrote:
You said that rescuing victims of blood-thirsty pirates was equatable with wanting to impose a draconian totalitarianism state over an independent sovereign peoples against their will.
I’m sorry but I genuinely don’t see the connection whatsoever.
Please quote me where I said, word for word, the above or even implied it?
2 June, 2012 at 4:08 pm #497972Tom, you understand perfectly well.
*thinks about it.
Then again, you probably don’t.
2 June, 2012 at 4:03 pm #498068Tsk Words. Van Gough is related to Darren Gough. Van is Darren’s secret love child. Van is called Van because his mother is from the House of Morrison. :P
2 June, 2012 at 3:24 pm #497967@tom wrote:
My kind of Nationalism, is merely born of one’s appreciation of one’s own cultural & historical heritage & homeland, we don’t want tyranny, nor control, nor domination, we do not hate others and we do not wish to impose our will on others unlike Sceptical’s mob.
Really?
So you didn’t write this then?
@tom wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to take Somalia, to be honest. It’d put a stop to the Somalian pirates that are currently going on a rampage. Would be hard for them to slip out of Somalian waters with the Nimitz shadowing them.
2 June, 2012 at 3:16 pm #4980652 June, 2012 at 3:13 pm #497965@wordsworth60 wrote:
@tom wrote:
. . . Also, the Magna Carta clearly states that foreign rule over England is illegal. . . . .
And yet you argue so strongly for the legacy of the House of Hanover . . . . . .
Ah Words. You see ppl like Tom wouldn’t know hypocrisy if it walked up and smacked them in the face.
I wonder if he actually knows The House of Windsor was the House of Saxe – Coburg and Gotha until it was changed in 1917?
2 June, 2012 at 2:45 pm #497729@wordsworth60 wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@wordsworth60 wrote:
an’ an’ an’ an’ . . . . . .
our feet are smelly ad sweaty and stick to the insoles. You can wash the smell out of the socks, but smelly sandals – yuck!
an’ an’ an’ an’ . . . . .
A porous layer between the soles of your feet and the insole of the sandals (if sandals can have ‘in’ soles) actually improves the air circulation
‘hones’!!!!
*hands Words a spade. Carry on digging, my friend! :P
an’ an’ an’ an’ . . . .
Exactly! If you do the garden in sandals – or anything outside – the dirt and stones get in between the insoles and hurt your feet
Sandals might have their place but it ain’t on my feet. I’m just opposed to Anti-Sock fascism and the eroding of our Great British traditions by Italian Euro-fashionista, Polish workers who send the money saved on socks back home to build major engineering works (built wearing boots bought with our money!) and the PC brigade who have probably said you can’t ‘sock’ any more.
an’ an’ an’ an’ . . . . . . (to be continued . . . . )
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
*goose steps upto Words and removes his keyboards.
*checks Words closet…
:P
Serioulsy funny post, though. If only those Polish wore socks with their sandals, we wouldn’t be in a douple dip recession, lol.
2 June, 2012 at 2:41 pm #497963@wordsworth60 wrote:
@tom wrote:
. .. . . . . My great granddad didn’t fight against your type . . . .
No, he probably didn’t . . . . . . . :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
*giggles
-
AuthorPosts
