Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@waspish wrote:
did any of you watch the following nights programme about enoch powells “rivers of blood speach” whilst i think he was a hiddeous racist. i also think that everything he said has come around. he warned about communities becoming ever more further apart. he warned that religious segregation would bring fear and mistrust. he also warned of allowing muslims into britain un checked. [oh how right he was] there is fear, there is mistrust, there is ethnic cleansing being done on housing estates all across britain. english people are being forced out of their villages, towns and homes. we the indigenous british people are now classed as second class people in our own country. we come second to foreign workers. we come second when it comes to housing needs and we come second in the ques for health and social care.
Wasp- if you dont write in paragraphs, you’ll have a coronary!
I’ve said so many times on here, perception is so different to reality
We don’t come “second” to foreign workers- in the main, foreign workers do jobs we “brits” can’t be arsed to do, ie picking vegetables for 12 back breaking hours a day- you may indeed be able to quote an example of a “foreign” worker getting a job over a Brit, but I could quote you hundreds where they dont. Our health service is for all, foreign patients dont queue jump anymore than us brits can- it doesnt happen.
As for ethnic cleansing on britains housing estates- not where i live (n ive said before, I have about 400 eastern europeans living in our village- which only has about 500 people in it anyway- they dont take over, they dont change our culture but our culture may evolve to include elements of their culture@waspish wrote:
consecutive government ministers have caved in to muslim demands for ever more powers and ever more consideration in work and home life. we english are not allowed to slaughter our own animals,[not that we woud want to] but the police and even the rspca turn a blind eye durin feast times. [festivals] small children are forced to watch animals being slowly killed as part of their religious conditioning. they are taught that death and suffering are part of the muslim faith. so that when they are told to rise and kill the infidel, they will not hesitate to do it. [after all theyve been around murder and suffering all their lives] in the 1940s and 1950s when the west indian people arrived here they suffered awful racism, they were treated like slaves and talked to in awful old tones. [calling children picanninnies for instance] this is real racism,and we the british were guilty as charged, but we mostly changed. not allowing a child to enter your home to a birthday party because they are black skinned is real racism
Err, now Im confused- we “english” slaughter our animals, where has the idea come from that we dont? We just dont do it in the way thay Muslims AND Jews do- funny though has the phrase “kosher” has come to mean something correct or legit and is part of our language yet the process is no different to halal
@waspish wrote:
.im glad to say that i dont know anyone who would do this nowadays. the threats of racist court cases and vast amouns of compensation demanded by muslims are no more than a smoke screen whilst they dig in deeper and demand even more. and we allow them to do it because were scared of being called racist. were not racist. the muslims are. they are the ones who refuse to live amongst the white comunity. they are the ones who are demanding secular education. they re the ones arming their children with lawyers phone numbers in case they are asked to do a job they see as only fit for infides to do. [such as cleaning jobs and the dirty end of nursing] take note, that you may see plenty muslim doctors and dentists. but you will never see a muslim care worker cleaning up after an elderly patient. you will never see a muslim working in homes for the more violent, and sexually overt people. these jobs are fit for infidels alone. muslims are allowed to claim for second and third wives on income support. they are allowed to turn down job offers on religious grounds. we arent. this is racism. muslims are allowed to run businesses [take aways and taxi firms for instance] that change hands every 6 months so that tax and n.i contributions dont get paid and they cant be prosecuted because no one ever owns the business. they simply swap shops or offices every 6 months. this is allowed under religious reasoning ??? how ??? police are at a loss as to what to do with the thousands of muslim women driving cars, they use the same lisence for 8 or 9 people at a time. they always refuse to speak english when arrested and as soon as they are charged, they are simply shipped off to pakistan for a year until the police stop looking for them. we cant do that… over three thousand young muslim women failed to return to school in england last year because they had been sent home to marry and never came back. but they will return when they are over 18 and they will then arive with their husband, his parents, their brothers and sisters, and aunts and uncles. this is not marriage it is mass invasion. there are schools all over england now that use english as a second language, the first is urdu or arabic. these children refuse to learn english and their parents refuse to educate them in english. this should be outlawed immediateley, but it wont because the first person to mention it will be held out to the baying mob and called a racist. thus ensuring the deafening silence we hear daily from oiur schools, hospitals and corridors of so called power. the only power that works in this country anymore is the power of the mosque. and youll be seing a lot more of it pretty soon. me ? im seriously looking to live elsewhere when i retire. northern australia is looking good. they dont allow religion of any kind in some of the northern territories, now thats the way forward for me.
I cannot believe the amount of simple ignorance you have spouted in this- i work in the NHS, trust me, we have Muslim cleaners, we have Muslims nurses who clean as much sh/it, vomit and pi/ss as the next person- we have sikhs, chinese, bwi, white, pink, black, gay, lesbian, disabled, middle class, working class etc etc etc and they all do their fair share
Prove to me that second and third wives can be claimed as income support where in British LAW they are recognised as second and third wives- and there wont be any proof cos in British LAW you cant have a second and third wife (jus cos a Muslim says its his second wife, jus like a Mormon too, doesnt mean she has ANY rights under british LAW)
THERE ARE NOT SCHOOLS “ALL OVER ENGLAND” THAT USE ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANUGUAGE- you have the most intense case of paranoia I have ever known and are second only to Emma in exaggeration to make a point. If you actually stopped using such ridiculously outlandish claims to support your concerns, you might find more people will listen with genuine interest rather than switch off
As for Northern Territories, the most multi cultural part of Australia and you want to move there :lol: :lol:
I doubt it would equal 20 million…thats rather a lot of people
If you used that line of thought, Shakespeare, Milton, Johnson, Keats, Wordsworth etc wouldnt be studied today
I get your point about the books you studied but it must be a coincidence…they can’t have kept the same syllabus for almost 20 years
Wikipedia may list 5.8 million Holocaust deaths but for anyone who studies WW2, then they will know this does not include the 11 million Russian civilians or the 4 million Polish civilians killed by the Germans during advances and retreats through Poland and White Russia.
Google it and see :wink:
always a pleasure…never a chore :wink:
R.O.T.T
A fine white example of our education system…makes you proud to be British….dunnit!! :wink:
@waspish wrote:
there is a hairdresser in london who is being sued for racial discrimination to the tune of 75k by a muslim woman who was refused a job, because she said she couldnt remove her headscarf and wouldnt cut mens hair. she was refused the job and rightly so. but she is suing the hairdresser for compensation. thats why were all so pisssed off.. cos muslims are choking the life out of british cultue.they occupy and demand, then spread and do the same again until they have an entire area. then they buy all the property en mass and do the same again. just have a think about it… has your local muslim area grown a lot in the last 5 years.?????
Y’see Wasp, only half a story is where it all goes wrong- she is suing because she was told she needed to display “the latest” haircuts personally and couldnt do that wearing a headscarf AND she was quite willing to cut mens hair
Why does wearing a headscarf prevent you from cutting someone’s hair?
End of the day- it should always be best person for the job, end of story- if she’s cr/ap, tell her she’s cr/ap and where she needs to improve
As I said, poor management and fluffing around the truth is what gets you in the mire
I’d hunt em down n shoot em like the dawg they are
If you’re on msn with someone you’ve never met, then there shouldnt be anything you would object to being read elsewhere or which would make the slightest difference copied n pasted elsewhere so it wouldnt matter really
If you’re on msn with someone you know n they’ve done it, have it out with them
It only takes one tree to make a thousand matches, it only takes one match to burn a thousand trees
(ok not really a saying but its very clever)
She’s got a face like a bag of smacked tw/ats
fu/ck me backwards til xmas
sh/it on a shovel
jus like a dwarf with learning difficulties, what you’re doing aint big and it aint clever (That one is normally reserved for the kids)
futhermuckingsockcooker (for the spoonerists amongst you)
Sunny
If anything it typifies poor management training- if you follow procedure and know you’re right, you can sack anyone (obviously assuming they are in the wrong :lol: ) no matter what colour, sexual preference or creed.
you may still get taken to a tribunal by people out for a scr/ew but that happens in the compensation culture we live in and its nothing to do with whether you were wrong to sack someone
Ive sacked lesbians, people who are registered disabled, women, men, gays, etc etc- if you’re in the right and have correct procedures, its simple
