Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@ubermik wrote:
Hardly surprising in a left wing apologist enviroment
If more non whites want to work there they should move there, if they cant be bothered to thats their problem
This kind of overt racism, because thats EXACTLY what it is should be classed and treated as such and the people responsible no matter how high a position they have should be sacked
We should be employing the people who are already live here and who were born here BEFORE creating unfair opportunitities for imported and often substandard foriegn imports
Y’see this is the problem and this is why is doesnt get resolved.
I actually agree (god forbid) with Emma GENERAL statement. Moving a business to another area for a more “diverse” workforce doesn’t make sense and clearly is inappropriate and should be challenged (just as if the opposite were occurring)
HOWVER, when fools use statements like “employing people who already live here and who were born here” shows such a unintelligent view. The people who they will be employing in Leicester (as Emma will testify) WERE born here, DO live here and ARE English and with that I have no problem.
The decision to move out of Corby is wrong based on diversity but to make cheap political points about “being born here” (by which I assume you mean non white) simply plays into the hands of the barking left wing brigade who condone these decisions and allows them to carry on because you portray the counter argument is terms of “NO dogs, No Irish and No Blacks” terminology which is as outdated as it is foolish
Had the decision been made on economic grounds (i.e they couldnt recruit or sustain a managed workforce in Corby etc) then every business has the right to re locate.
Emma
Thats Baaaa NOT Blaaahhhh
Norfolk in school hols n New Zealand some time before the year is out- nothing much this year :D
Unless LIFE imprisonment means exactly that- no parole, escorted walks in shopping centres, etc- LIFE means you are never, ever come out except in a box.
As long as you have “life” sentences with 4 year tariffs (ffs) then you will have a majority view which sees that justice is not done, that sees the guilty getting away with murder, that believes the debt to society hasnt been paid, that has no faith in the justice system and reverts back to its basic instinct.
Oh, and yes, we should hang him (if found guilty of course) from the highest tree
@emmalush wrote:
@slayer wrote:
But what about the 50’s is it that worked well? Why do you feel 50’s society was so much better than today’s? I don’t necessarily disagree that socially the 50’s were a more cohesive, settled, inclusive era BUT I do not accept that multi culturalism has been the cause of this country’s social breakdown
Social cohesion was better, as was the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. Now we have atleast 3 asian only areas, white only areas and black only areas. There are faith schooling, more segregation. People dont wana mix, it is not a lovely dovey society thats portrayed. We are constantly lied to. Gun crime is enourmous, thats partly due to a mass of differing cultures, people feeling the need to defend themselves. Also because we have a namby pamby government.
Racial unrest has been big over recent years, weve had numerous murders, riots, hundreds of “discrimination” cases. Again, this causes a them versus us divide, all the governments fault for allowing a multicultural society.
We waste hundreds of thousands, millions maybe on racial organisations. We (the patriotic white community) dont need it. We’d be better off letting you guys fund that.
A successfull society needs a core base of political and social belief, that most people agree with.
At the moment, we dont collectively know what the belief is specifically, other than, we allow non white and non English/british people a fairer go than ourselves. Most people disagree that the multicultural experiment is working, but they dont vote against it yet, rather vote for the very basics, that they think the has been still know what their doing. Most voters are stupid, easily sold, a blaggers dream. The deal is to rally the millions who dont vote, their desperate for a way out of this nightmare.
We’ll never have community spirit whilst theres a mass multiple of differing cultures to feed.
The minority cultures will suffer slayer, when push becomes shove, when the decent people get enough crap thrown at them, unless we do something soon.
You will be in a desperate position. My advice to any non white or non patriot, think about getting out within the next 5 years or so.
Social cohesion better in the 80’s under Thatcher and in the 70’s- the decade of unrest, 3 day week, work to rule, strikes, the dead and rubbish not collected, powercuts, – no, i think it most definitely wasn’t. Social cohesion has broken because of the failure of the family unit- most divorces in Europe, most cohabiting couples in Europe, most single parent families in Europe, highest teenage pregnancy rate in the Western world- the family unit was what held this society together- that has disappeared and hence certain sections of society are now failing- many reasons abound for this breakdown- the lack of discipline and move to a more liberalised society, the advent of contraception (and legal abortion) for women which heralded a new era of sexual freedom, experimentation and lack of responsibility- the baby boomers born in the 60’s and 70’s grew up with a set of moral codes, subconscioulsy given to them by their parents, which manifests itself in the binge, sex immoral culture of today.
BUT little of it has to do with anyone’s colour and with multiculturalism. Just because we have areas where other races feel uncomfortable doesnt make it right- for every area you state where people live in discord, I can show you ten, twenty areas where people live in relative harmony.
You think people in the 50’s werent lied to? The 50’s were the last decade of national innocence, the last decade where people obeyed without question (this post wouldnt have even been thought of in the 50’s), the last decade when social class truly meant anything. Governments govern by being economical with the truth- the 50’s were no different than today except governments of today appear to be more underhand as they try and squash leaks, rumours etc which manifest themselves in many forms of media outlet (specificallythe internet)
Social unrest is and has been endemic in this country and has been for centuries- remember the poll tax riots- largest event of social unrest since the ….oh since the 80’s and the miners strike- dont remember colour or race having anything to do with it. We have had single faith schools for centuries (Jewish, Catholic, CoE) but no one is bothered until the faith is non christian and then hypocrisy flows (incidentally, I believe ALL single faith schools should be banned and have state funded schools only)
We actually agree on the problems we as individuals, and as society face- what we don’t agree on is the cause. The lack fo faith in politics and politicians over the last 20 years demonstrated ably by the reduction in the number of people who vote, has much more to do with a failure to have a common political belief than anything to do with multiculturalism. Emma, if every non white, half white, non english person left the country tomorrow, you’d still have exactly the same fundamental problems which exist now. Demonising sections of our society (which whether you like it or not is the method of genocide- Nazi Germnay, Rwanda, the Balkans- portray the enemy as unworthy and let loose the masses of destruction) is not ony counter productive, it actually increases any polarisation through stereotyping.
I’ve now finished my weetabix
@emmalush wrote:
1. Ive explained this.
2. Anywhere they can, or stay here.
3. I want a society thats as free from harm as we humans can get it, with it pleasurable. We havn’t tried nazism, and im not sure if any kind of nazism would work. What did work quite well was about the 1950’s without the multuculturalists taking a strong hold.
Now if we could have that, mixed with the modernised good we have today, we’d be better off.
I cannot understand why you want a mixture that doesn’t work, barmy.
But what about the 50’s is it that worked well? Why do you feel 50’s society was so much better than today’s? I don’t necessarily disagree that socially the 50’s were a more cohesive, settled, inclusive era BUT I do not accept that multi culturalism has been the cause of this country’s social breakdown
@capybara wrote:
Within the last couple of years my Father unfortunately was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease.
His mental health rapidly declined after the initial diagnosis and the only drug he has ever been given is for agitation, nothing to relieve the symptoms of this devastating illness.
Alzheimer’s drugs for early and late stage patients having been deemed too expensive at a cost of £2.50 a day by NICE (National Institute for Clinical excellence) and not cost effective.
He has to live in a care home which is in Gillingham Kent with 24/7 care which costs him nearly £1000 pounds a month out of his army pension, many people have to sell their homes to pay for their care.
Someone who has contributed so much to his or her country should not be kicked in the teeth by this government in their old age.
Because of my Fathers predicament I have become a supporter of the Alzheimer’s society, who are challenging the NICE decision in the High Court.
I have set up an epetition on the Prime Ministers website and would be very grateful for any support the link isbelowI’ve signed cos I don’t believe NICE are an organisation who have patients interests at heart
Just a point, and perhaps insensitive to make it here,- I’ve quoted part of capy’s post above- not sure what the relevance was regarding his armed service- the piece Ive quoted is just as powerful an indictment.
Surely if the drug is for all, then the fact the father has Alzheimers is all the qualification needed- I signed because of the way your father has been treated by NICE
Or perhaps Im being difficult
Oh ffs- n there was me bein all nice n girly in “polls”
Shudda known better
:lol:Emma
For all our disagreements n differing views, that is genuinely appreciated
PMSL
Emma hunny, i may be many things in life but I can swear on my mums life that I am Slayer and no other JC user- I have never ever used any other name on these boards but Slayer and never will.
I have no idea who Genie is tho clearly he has similar views as me (although we clashed on capital punishment I believe)- Genie’s posts are longer and more thoughtful than mine- I have 4 kids to control and my posts are quick n simple
In fact I intensely dislike multi name users as it spoils JC- you, like me, will always be who you are
I am honoured that after 18 months I have a poll named after me and amazed its for multiple users
