Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@emmalush wrote:
8. Until you tell us, were then entitled to assume, maybe wrongly, but thats for you to explain. I’ll guess, that you are a white christian, who has married a blck/asian and or foreigner, and has had children with her, bit like slayer :D
Awww, have i had that much of an impact that you can’t forget me- I’m touched, truly, truly touched
@emmalush wrote:
Perhaps if we just segregated you-
@slayer wrote:
You do seem very certain of who doesn’t get on but who is “we“- southerners and northerners, catholics and protestants?
@emmalush wrote:
Who’s “we” indeed.
Oh I see, you just naturally assumed every white person in this country thinks like you and you singularly used the royal “we”. Or was it jus you n a couple of like minded mates n that was enough for a concensus. Either way, you have given me a laugh today
@emmalush wrote:
2. Which would you prefer to live in, a white patriotic English/british, secular/pagan/christian based hetrosexual society, or eveything else?
@slayer wrote:
]I live in a patriotic, British, christian country now- why would I want to change?
@emmalush wrote:
For a white English/british version, oops, you cant. You’ll have to live with the non whites, sorry slayer. Send us a postcard of your time in the hellhole ideology you signed up for?
Thanx Emma, but I’d rather live free and with the rest of the human race than with a anachronistic, fuddled, white supremacist like you. I know which side my bread is buttered. And you have changed from a English only to an English/British- make your mind up.
@emmalush wrote:
Its SOOOOOOOO interesting of white liberal extremists like slayer and new labour etc, that they need the white patriotic community to go to work to feed their multiculturalised society.
When are the white patriotic community going to realise they’d be better off without the multiculturalists?
When they next hold their meeting in the local phone box they can discuss it. But thanks for calling me liberal and extremist (that stretches the imagination). Never been called liberal before so I can add it to my list- you bore me now so your trollish behaviour has been superseded by the desire to finish Michael Palin’s dairies
@ugo wrote:
@slayer wrote:
Kings of Leon, Lincoln’s Engine Shed, half an hour ago- simply awesome
Nuff said
I take it you mean Lincoln`s Engine Shed as in that one yes ..?:? :? :? :?
Thats what I said- Lincoln’s Engine Shed
@emmalush wrote:
1. Seeing as we dont all get along, is segregation of culture’s worth considering?
Perhaps if we just segregated you-
You do seem very certain of who doesn’t get on but who is “we”- southerners and northerners, catholics and protestants?
@emmalush wrote:
2. Which would you prefer to live in, a white patriotic English/british, secular/pagan/christian based hetrosexual society, or eveything else?
You’re barking- are you sure your not half afrikaans? I live in a patriotic, British, christian country now- why would I want to change?
@emmalush wrote:
Slayer and genie would choose the criminals side :D
Aww, thanx
Kings of Leon, Lincoln’s Engine Shed, half an hour ago- simply awesome
Nuff said
@ubermik wrote:
Well whizzing through superficially the government is selectively representing the issue
Congestion is being rapidly created NOT by the claimed increase in cars, but my hundreds of thousands of lost road miles all over the country to cycle lanes, bus lanes, crossings and other traffic obstacles reducing road size and stealing entire lanes in a road system that needed to be bolstered 30 years ago but wasnt
Talk about selective representation.
You base an argument on a supposition which we are expected to accept with no evidence- next time I’m stuck in a 2 hour queue on the M6, or M25, or M4, or M1 or A1 or A14 or etc etc (caused by sheer volume of traffic), I’ll feel better for knowing the true reason is the mythical cycle lane running down the hard shoulder
The answer is not to simply raise a further tax through road charges but look at the reasons behind congestion- school runs have a massive impact between 0800 and 0900 (been lovely this week for those who live in an area which is on half term) as one example
@ubermik wrote:
As an example, suppose someone finds an asian who smells of curry because its its staple diet repulsive because of that smell. They would be criticised, called a racist, told to be more tolerant etc
I take it you mean Pakistani or Indian (Asia is a big place and it says more about you than the rest of the post by stereotyping a whole continent)- actually the staple diet is rice but lets not split hairs.
If you dislike someone because they smell of curry whats that got to do with their colour, sexuality or creed.
@ubermik wrote:
If someone dislikes gay men because they find the act of anal sex or other things they majoratively do abhorrent that would also be the same were a straight or bi person doing them, but the brainwashed folks would still disagree with them disliking “gays” even tho the dislike isnt JUST because they are gay, but is because of a trait or facet of that gayness
But as most men find oral (and anal) sex a distinctly pleasurable experience when with a woman, then your dislike is because the man is gay NOT the act he enters (sic) into.
@ubermik wrote:
I make no apologies for those dislikes nor will I pretend I dont have them just to appease the idiots who think we should all love all the ickle gay folks JUST because they are gay
Who says we should love gays, or treat them different- don’t treat them differently is exactly how we should be- if I call my mate a c/unt for acting like a tw/at- I’ll do it whatever his sexuality
@ubermik wrote:
But claiming to support a gays right to be how they are but not a person who dislikes gays EQUAL right IS bigotted, close minded and not liberal in the slightest because its selective and seeks to enforce a value system onto other people making it completely contradictive and hypocritical in its misconception and application
It is the very opposite of that- however as a JC newbie, I would not expect anything less as you all have so much to learn, are illiterate when it comes to chat rooms and should have “L” plates on for the first 6 months because your comments are ludicrously laughable
@emmalush wrote:
But if you’re white and dare to understand the problem, by stating the obvious, as did Talkshow host James whale who said recently, “this is a black on black problem”, then you are called “racist”, as James was.
Who called him “racist”?
Baaa, Baaaa
If you dislike someone for their colour, creed, sexuality etc without knowing them as an individual, you are stereotyping the individual into a box (tarring all with the same brush).
It’s like believing (jus cos I’m a Derby fan) that all Leicester fans are in bred f/uckwits- clearly this is at least 99% inaccurate.
Don’t follow the crowd Emma, be an individual and know people for who they are NOT what they are
