Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@robbo wrote:
This Scottish hating and English hating has to stop.
And I agree with you, Bad…British tennis is still alive with this up and coming 19 year old…Well played to him..I have been watching him all year on the tournements Live Score Boards….He is going to be better than Henman and Rudseki ever were.
Again, well played to him.
Whats rudseski got to do with british tennis, he’s canadian.
I heard that in scotland on saturday, some scottish racists were on their knees thanking “god” England lost.
An English lad was beaten up by a mob of scottish lads after the game too.
Support murray, NEVER! Im not supporting any more foreigners.
Becks walked before he new he’d be pushed.
Quite frankly, if being the captain means so much, why give it up, why not fight for it…
@forumhostpb wrote:
@Emmaflush wrote:
Should YOU be persecuted for giving your opinion in a private meeting?
Remind me… isn’t inciting racial hatred an offence in law???
Yes.
A. What constitutes in words spoken, “incitement to racial hatred”?
A1. Has it been proven, that racial hatred occured due to the words spoken at that meeting, no. Not one single person welcomed by BNP policy, has caused racial hatred due to words spoken.
A2. Whilst racial hatred has not occured, incitement has not been proved.
B. Should the BBC be in court for publishing “incitement to racial hatred”?
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
OK. But is there any info about what they actually said anywhere? It all seems a little hush-hush and I can’t find anything completely factual ( not being a Master Googler like some on here!) so I can’t think about it properly.
Nick griffin called Islam “a wicked vicious faith”.
Muslims have said in public, “death to England” etc, without punishment, so it cant be wrong to say what Nick said.
On the one hand it sounds like persecution and on the other the CPS seem pretty sure of their case.
The CPS are just doing what their political masters tell them to do.
I’d be there supporting the defendants if I could find some actual facts to base an argument on, rather than the logical fallacies on the BNP sites or others you have listed.
The BNP are quite open about this case, they have to be, they know unless new labour go bent, they will win. If NL go bent, the BNP will claim martydom (is that how you spell it?).
When the BNP win AGAIN, they will claim support, they know that.I mean things like “the meeting was held in private” is not actually a defense against the accusations and is merely an attempt to change the argument into one which is winnable for the defendants.
Arnt people allowed to defend themselves :roll:
Should YOU be persecuted for giving your opinion in a private meeting?@Mr Amphibian wrote:
Were they asking those present to take some sort of action against another group of people
They suggested so, as do all political parties.
were they merely stating political policy or viewpoints
That aswell.
Too busy to watch him and wimbledon come to that. When does he play next, ill support the other player :wink:
@Bad Manners wrote:
Look the guy make a rash comment. That’s all.
Im sure he said “Anyone but England” as a joke, but even if he didnt mean it as a joke, he should have really kept his opinion to himself.Hey, i dont mind him saying “anyone but England”, as along as he doesnt benefit from my country.
So, when is racist murray going to leave my country, and never come back unless he sincerley appologisies to all English men, women and children?
BNP website, 30th june:
“15:20 hrs BST…..News just in……Nick Griffin and Mark Collett are to face a full retrial commencing 30th October. Reporting restrictions are in place which prevents us going into detail but readers will be familiar with the background.This is a political move to try and jail two key people in the BNP leadership team and to waste several hundred thousand pounds of taxpayers’ money in the process.
This is nothing more than State sponsored persecution of two men who dared to challenge the Labour regime and mention the Islamic fifth column in our midst. “
Free speech, but not if your the leader or member of a rival legal political party.
How would YOU feel, if YOU dared to challenge the political elite, scare them with policy they know could gain millions of votes in the future, and they tried to bang you up on mickey mouse charges, how would you feel?
Is it wrong to describe how you feel, in a private meeting? Isnt that a free and democratic human right of expression?
Should YOU be persecuted for doing such a thing?
Should they…
@dropped-anchor wrote:
I`m shocked that people actually watch the game of, of, er what`s it called, er, oh yeah tennis.
Honestly though, if Murray gets through and wins the final, how many of the media will actually say he is “Scottish” and prefer to say he is British???The media want to call him british, because they want to report his failure or success to a wider auidience.
What they dont focus on much, is his anti-English stance, and his scottish wrist band.
@drivel wrote:
@soulie wrote:
Carragher does not play his best there, yeah hes strong and can protect the defence but that will offer us nothing as an attacking outlet, we need to supplie gerrard and lampard with a good service when coming out of defence
We need to play 2 feckin forwards insteaad of 5 stupid midfielders – we hardly created a chance against Ecquador
Ffs Lampard has been firing blanks all tournament and Gerrard hasn’t startedWe only have 2 forwards, so we have to limit their play if we are to win the world cup.
That is the managers fault.
Whilst we have a wealth of attacking midfield talent, its not too much of a disaster.
If we beat portugal, it will be because our midfield out do theirs.
