P@sssordone

I’m pretty sure we can’t even black start the national grid, because it depends on so much other infrastruture that itself requires the electrical grid to be online.

That’s part of the reason why we trade electricity with other nations. I imagine in particular that France’s nuclear reactors would be very important in stabalising the voltage on…[Read more]

That is all very naive Fishy.

There wouldn’t be any food to distribute without imports, the UK doesn’t have enough land to feed 80 million people. Even if we somehow magically summoned more land into existance, we would still have to import chemicals to fertalise the land, pesticides, and machinery to farm the crops.

Fire engines aren’t much…[Read more]

Im sure land rovers probably have some critical uses somewhere in forestry or agriculture, but JLR is just one example, all car makers are running a limited production due to shortages.

Do we need cars to live?

In the modern world, yes.

We need cars to get to work, lorries and vans to transport goods, ambulences to take people to the hospital, ect.

This Daily Mail article gets the reason wrong, but it proves that production has been suspended.

Silicon is only made in a few factories, mostly in Taiwan, that all operate at 100% capacity.

The car industry underestimated demand for new cars so they canceled their orders with TSMC, so the production capacity was sold to other customers (mostly…[Read more]

Most of them?

More or less everything is still reliant on just in time manufacturing.

For example, Jaguar Land Rover has shut down most of its car production due to the global silicon shortage, which is disrupting supply chains in nearly every industry in every country.

People seem to keep demanding sources, so heres one I guess…[Read more]

Lol.

You missed the point again…

That’s somewhat of a narrow view. No matter how much labour you put in you can’t repair anything without any tools or materials. These need concrete, wood, steel, petrol, ect.

The manufacturing of these things then depends on many other things, which depend on other things. The whole ecconomy is integrated, you can’t remove any individual part…[Read more]

The whole concept of lockdowns and key workers was deeply flawed from the beginning.

The ecconomy is very complex and tightly integrated, sea defenses can’t be repaired without a whole host of other products and services in their supply chains.

I saw some people in Labour claim it was racist, they called it variant E-<something>, then said its a concern because it’s more infectious than the ‘Kent‘ variant.

Yes this is how vaccines work, I described this in a previous post.

What is this suppose to prove?

The NHS had no idea what they were looking at.

To what extent i’ve been diagnosed has been though university research.

I work

I guess I just imagined all of the times that guests would spam the room about how I slept in a library when I was homeless for a few weeks.

More that I predicted that the pandemic would happen as soon as I heard rumours about what was happening in Wuhan, and took appropriate actions to profit from it.

(Buying as much gold as could possibly…[Read more]

Lying doesn’t really work when it’s public record what you said.

Your response to my (accurate) description of how vaccines work was to call me a conspiracy theorist.

The only conclusion one can draw from that is that you think what I described is a conspiracy theory.

No.

Try reading again, I think that 60% protection isn’t good enough.

You certainly can’t pass laws on restricting unvaccinated people based on something this poor (not that you should be allowed to anyway).

Vaccine manufacturers must do better, and be held to the same standards as other industries.

It’s weird how people who claim to care about other people’s health so much keep attacking me over my health problems.

It’s almost as if they don’t actually care, and their motivations are not what they say they are …

I will ask the same kind of question again, as it seems everyone missed my point (as usual).

Do you think a car that has brakes that work 85% of the time (60% after 6 months) would pass an MOT test?

Is that a standard that you think is acceptable?

It’s better than if the brakes didn’t work at all, isn’t it?

It seems that i’m the only one who does.

You called antibodies a conspiracy theory.

No, I just have absolutely zero faith in the NHS to do anything competantly.