Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@tiler wrote:
The point is, he is against Western terrorism, and the Iraqi’s who support the Western terrorists. and any others who do the same.
Words are only words on a screen, observing the actions, are much more informative.
The word terrorist is bandied about in many cases illogically, where is the difference about those that send missiles into civilian areas, and a suicide bomber in a civilian area, both are terrible acts,
At least the s/bomber has the courage to give his life, whereas those sending the missiles sit nice and safe, in their hidey holes.
Western words are full of hypocrisy, about bringing freedom and democracy, its pure greed and establishing a power base in the Middle East, to support the Israeli terror regime.
Yes, Tiler is takes a real “terrorist” to behead an unarmed bound man- tell me how Zaqwari having the courage to send dozens of suicide bombers from his “safe, hidey hole” is any different to others in Iraq sending their denizens of death into people’s homes and streets- why didnt he become one of them?
Your ignorance in suggesting the Shia’s support America and hence are a justifiable target is barking. I am wholly and totally against this war but even more against fools like you who find reason to justify those who commit evil
@emmalush wrote:
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-13528096,00.html
“would not be considered for parole for atleast 5 years and 108 days”.
Do you EVER imagine the pain and anguish family members go through when the above happens?
Why do you vote for a society that doesnt punish evil?
How do I vote for “society”- I am currently only able to vote for politicians, celebrities on reality TV shows and eejuts in Big Brother- I can’t vote for judges either
Shame becuase this could have been a good thread to debate sentencing and justice, however you chose to make a cheap political point out of a childs rape.
And as for your sanctimonious (look it up) clap trap about “Do you EVER….etc”- many on here have children, dont be so presumptious to assume we don’t spend a few minutes thinking of a family involved in this
@emmalush wrote:
@slayer wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
@Magoo wrote:
I think you will find Walcott is the middle finger to the FA. I actually cannot see this lad playing unless we are desperate.
We were desperate for a striker to replace owen yesterday, and ended not playing walcott, when defoe couldve done the job instead of downing.
And the result of the match was……?
England won an opening qualifying match for the first time since 1982
Wrong, we beat tunisia 2-0 in 98.
Yes we won 1-0, but my point is, if you take off a striker (our best available aswell) after 60mins, and replace him with an inexperienced winger, then its negative.
Had we had defoe, he would’ve been the natural replacement, and surely would’ve come on, so why the need for walcott?????
Yes, we beat Tunisia 2-0 in France- my memory isnt what it was.
So he took off a striker who did absolutely nothing for 60 minutes and puts Joe Cole into a holding role- made sense at the time and still does- it did show Crouch up as a very limited target man with little ability to pass the ball effectively
Still comes back to my main point- we won 1-0, we are one result away from qualifying for the next round after only playing one game and your point is to moan about the fact we won- no better than our hyped up media trying to create something out of nothing
@emmalush wrote:
@Tory Girl wrote:
Perhaps if people were more understanding of people that came to live in this country or any other country, then perhaps foreign citizens wouldnt feel the need to segregate and live within their own culture
Other cultures beside the English normality of life, do naturally segregate themselves, thats why multiculturalism has not, cannot, and never will work.The “English normality of life”- what the feck is that all about then- that doesnt even make any sense in a literal form
The BNP are anti-war, maybe we should deal with those who want war?
Well the BNP are anti the Iraq war but nowhere (including the BNP website) have I seen any indication that the BNP are a pacifist party which abhors conflict of any description
@emmalush wrote:
@Magoo wrote:
I think you will find Walcott is the middle finger to the FA. I actually cannot see this lad playing unless we are desperate.
We were desperate for a striker to replace owen yesterday, and ended not playing walcott, when defoe couldve done the job instead of downing.
And the result of the match was……?
England won an opening qualifying match for the first time since 1982
@emmalush wrote:
@chathostuk wrote:
So it would appear that the militant leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq is no more. What do we think the consequences will be?
He will be seen as a hero who fought for many people, and more people will salute what he stood for.
Really- even your standing has taken a dive calling Al Zaqwari and a “hero for many and more people will salute what he stood for”
Al Zaqwari was an evil, butcherous excuse of human life- his view of Islam was Sunni based and he called for the deaths of all Shia’s- he had no interest in anything other than perpetuating discord and mayhem- very, very few Iraqi’s supported him or his views
Even your beloved George Galloway called the assasination of Al Zaqwari “morally justified”- just because the current war in Iraq is wrong doesnt make Al Zaqwari a “hero”
There is no doubt he was the mastermind and planner behind much of the violence, not only in Iraq but also overseas.
But certainly not the only one.
Did Chat say that he was the only one?
@forumhostpb wrote:
@slayer wrote:
Did you actually read this report or just take the soundbites from the BNP website- the conclusions you draw are not the same as the report but then I wouldn’t expect them to be-
“there’s none so blind as those who see”
Er….. you missed out the ”cannot” Slayer, but I’m sure that the lovely Emmaflush wouldn’t have understood your point anyway.
:oops: :oops:
Sleep deprivation n lack of sex is all I can put that down to
Did you actually read this report or just take the soundbites from the BNP website- the conclusions you draw are not the same as the report but then I wouldn’t expect them to be-
“there’s none so blind as those who see”
As Tommy said- always welcome willing victims :lol:
What I find sooo funny is that you can’t accept that the BNP are no different than any other political party in how they operate- untrustworthy, underhand and willing to deceive.
