"People's Vote"

sceptical guy wrote:

Ge wrote:

The Economist owned by Industrialists and bankers and best of all, at the head, the Rothschild family.

Ge wrote:

mooosey88 wrote:

Oh do you mean the Rothschild family who had direct dealings in setting up the common market ?

That’s the one yes, the Rothschilds and the Ecomomist he threatens with is their bought and paid for mouthpiece….he just doesn’t understand that ECB monetary policy is enshrined in EU law courtesy of the Rothschilds economic ideology.

Ge wrote:

mooosey88 wrote:

Oh do you mean the Rothschild family who had direct dealings in setting up the common market ?

I did tell you I like an oh ye. Oh ye the GERMAN descendant Rothschilds. Scratches head, ooo I wonder what country benefits most from the EU and the Eurozone and the actual Euro…

Lol.

This is disgusting!!

The Rothschilds aren’t German. They were German when they were established in banking (in Frankfurt), but they became particularly noted in French banking in the 19th century. They are now divided into several families according to nation – Austria, France, Britain and Italy. There was no German branch at all between 1901 And 1989.

It’s the British section of the Rothschild family which owns 21% of The Economist

21%. A good portion, but hardly the majority.

So why choose the Rothschilds?

The fact is that the Rothschilds are a family of Jewish financiers. They are known for being Jewish, not German (or French or British., for that matter).

Don’t tell me you don’t know this. Conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds have almost always meant anti-Semitism (dog-whistle, even).

The Rothschilds have been the centre of anti-Semitic charges of European and world domination by Jews ever since Alphonse Toussenel’s The Jews, Kings of Our Time in 1843, via Hitler’s attacks on the Rothschilds as secretly controlling the world.

One of the conspiracy theories is that the Jews founded the Common Market through the money of the Rothschilds.

mooosey88 wrote:

Oh do you mean the Rothschild family who had direct dealings in setting up the common market ?

I genuinely can’t believe that she knows what she’s saying??

Does she not realise the logic??

As an example, one anti-Semitic group called the vote for brexit a blow against the Jewish conspiracy in this vile piece of anti-Jewish filth– “The Secretive Bank of England essay of Forbidden History directly focused on the Rothschild scheme to subjugate Christian Europe under the Talmud exalted usury plot of the bankster conquest. Make no mistake about the actual state of affairs.

Europe long ago came under the rule of zealot Zionists, who use multiculturalism as the Judas goat of national annihilation. This enemy of Western Civilization practices the worst of all identity politics with their chosen protocols.

The vote in favour of Brexit is a mere emotional victory without the required and necessary renunciation of the Shylock monetary system of central banking tyranny”.

Brexit is victory over the Rothschilds and EU Globalists http://humansarefree.com/2016/07/brexit-is-victory-over-rothschilds-eu.html

These conspiracy theories. Ugh!!

I use the financial press, including The Economist, not because I’m a tool of the Rothschilds but because they represent an accurate picture of what is going on in current affairs.

If anyone can show how they’re wrong, I’m more than willing to listen.

But I#m not going to listen to anti-Semitic filth, whether dog-whistle or not, whether people realise what they’re saying or not.

NO YOU ARE DISGUSTING FOR BRINGING IN ANTI- SEMITISM !! Our dialogue had nothing to do with anti- semitism AND YOU KNOW IT, The Rothchild family had a direct influence on how we entered the common market working with the Tory party !! That is the only connection !  To drag in Germans being anti-semantic and try and label me and others the same is vile. You took those comments deliberately out of context . I’ve been told many times that you were sly and manipulative but I didn’t believe it , I just thought you were a bit pompous , a know it all. Now I can see the truth of it, spending hours misquoting and re- misquoting in order to blacken someone’s character , you horrible person. I’m disgusted with you. To oppose someone’s politics is one thing to try and discredit someone’s character out of sour grapes is quite another. Flabbergasted how low you got ! Do not ask me anything, expect an answer, assume anything because i don’t answer or speaks for me AGAIN.

1 member liked this post.

marbles

At least I have the decency to openly apologise if I feel I’ve come across as patronising, instead of ” if you feel that way well an open apology ” which basically means nothing apart from ” if your too sensitive and are upset I’ll apologise even though i know I’ve done nothing wrong”

Even people who want to remain never like his posts …. Why is that I wonder ?  Maybe they’ve seen what I now see ….. Nasty man disguised as a learned liberal…. Wishing to bestow his years of wisdom with those less fortunate … Totally done, actually makes me shudder …

Lol.  Yea. Drop a real shit bomb and scuttle off till ‘ after the festive season’ …. The epitome of SLY. Christian ? I’ve got tea towels with more Christian values than that cowardly excuse ….

I’m not offended as everyone entitled to an opinion

I just want the right to choose the way we exit the EU

If its WTO I’m taking my husband and moving to Ireland where I won’t be affected

When i voted leave, i didnt vote that way because i thought it would be a quick fix. I voted leave knowing things were likely to be a lot, lot worse before they had any chance of getting better.

There is potential that leaving will affect us negatively economically, businesses unable to get the things they need due to importation, our health system struggling to get drugs etc etc..

Voting leave wasnt a short term decision for me, it was in the hope that my daughter and her generation had a better future.

1 member liked this post.

thin ice