Fair-D

I can confirm this is correct.

Because it is unhealthy, and we have a publicly funded health system.

That makes it your civil duty to minimise your healthcare costs.

A

???

I was talking about easter eggs, she fasts over lent.

I usually just eat my gf’s eggs

Black passports are for African countries with anti-colonial policies.

👍

Blue would be the closest, as yellow passports don’t exist.

Red passports are for socialists.

The bible itself isn’t even clear on who Jesus is, or even if he was a singular person. This is best demonstrated by the reaction the crowd gave to Barabbas, when given the choice between him and Jesus. They acted as if Barabbas was the one who performed the micracles, not Jesus.

Barabbas translates to ‘son of the father’, and some versions of…[Read more]

If the Abrahamic god existed it would be trivially easy to prove.

If god interacted whith the physical universe in anyway, we could detect and study the interaction and conclude that no known force could have caused the interaction other than outside interference.

No such interactions have ever been recorded.

So we must conclude that either…[Read more]

I’m not really sure that carbon dating would prove anything, the bible doesn’t say much about when Jesus was suppose to be alive. It mentions Pontius Pilate, who was in power around 36–39 AD, but naming the wrong roman official doesn’t really matter that much, the Roman Empire was around in some form in the general area until the 15th Century. A…[Read more]

I’m not really sure that carbon dating would prove anything, the bible doesn’t say much about when Jesus was suppose to be alive. It mentions Pontius Pilate, who was in power around 36–39 AD, but naming the wrong roman official doesn’t really matter that much, the Roman Empire was around in some form in the area until the 15th Century.

I’m not really sure that carbon dating would prove anything, the bible doesn’t say much about when Jesus was suppose to be alive. It mentions Pontius Pilate, who was in power around 36–39 AD, but naming the wrong roman official doesn’t really matter that much.

I don’t see how you could prove that the shroud was used on Jesus.

If Jesus was a real person, we don’t what what he looked like, or have his DNA (if he even had DNA, being God).

Even if through carbon dating, or some other method showed that the shround wasn’t 2000 years old, it doesn’t disprove that it was used by Jesus either. As there is no…[Read more]

I don’t see how you could prove that the shroud was used on Jesus.

If Jesus was a real person, we don’t what what he looked like, or have his DNA (if he even had DNA, being God).