Fair-D

Most of them?

More or less everything is still reliant on just in time manufacturing.

For example, Jaguar Land Rover has shut down most of its car production due to the global silicon shortage, which is disrupting supply chains in nearly every industry in every country.

People seem to keep demanding sources, so heres one I guess…[Read more]

Lol.

You missed the point again…

That’s somewhat of a narrow view. No matter how much labour you put in you can’t repair anything without any tools or materials. These need concrete, wood, steel, petrol, ect.

The manufacturing of these things then depends on many other things, which depend on other things. The whole ecconomy is integrated, you can’t remove any individual part…[Read more]

The whole concept of lockdowns and key workers was deeply flawed from the beginning.

The ecconomy is very complex and tightly integrated, sea defenses can’t be repaired without a whole host of other products and services in their supply chains.

I saw some people in Labour claim it was racist, they called it variant E-<something>, then said its a concern because it’s more infectious than the ‘Kent‘ variant.

Yes this is how vaccines work, I described this in a previous post.

What is this suppose to prove?

The NHS had no idea what they were looking at.

To what extent i’ve been diagnosed has been though university research.

I work

I guess I just imagined all of the times that guests would spam the room about how I slept in a library when I was homeless for a few weeks.

More that I predicted that the pandemic would happen as soon as I heard rumours about what was happening in Wuhan, and took appropriate actions to profit from it.

(Buying as much gold as could possibly…[Read more]

Lying doesn’t really work when it’s public record what you said.

Your response to my (accurate) description of how vaccines work was to call me a conspiracy theorist.

The only conclusion one can draw from that is that you think what I described is a conspiracy theory.

No.

Try reading again, I think that 60% protection isn’t good enough.

You certainly can’t pass laws on restricting unvaccinated people based on something this poor (not that you should be allowed to anyway).

Vaccine manufacturers must do better, and be held to the same standards as other industries.

It’s weird how people who claim to care about other people’s health so much keep attacking me over my health problems.

It’s almost as if they don’t actually care, and their motivations are not what they say they are …

I will ask the same kind of question again, as it seems everyone missed my point (as usual).

Do you think a car that has brakes that work 85% of the time (60% after 6 months) would pass an MOT test?

Is that a standard that you think is acceptable?

It’s better than if the brakes didn’t work at all, isn’t it?

It seems that i’m the only one who does.

You called antibodies a conspiracy theory.

No, I just have absolutely zero faith in the NHS to do anything competantly.

Please read the earlier discussion about the definition of what a vaccine is.

It must provide immunity to a virus.

If it doesn’t reliably do this then it fails at being a vaccine.

Wearing a mask (arguably) reduces your chances of getting covid, it isn’t a vaccine.

That isn’t to say that you shouldn’t get the vaccination, but consider the earlier discussion about care home workings being required to have vaccinations.

Why is 85% 65% an acceptable level of risk here when it’s not for other things that safeguard human life.

Then I would say that the Cholera vaccine doesn’t work very well. Vaccines are something that it is important to get right, especially when you are trying to use them as a justification for something like lifting the lockdowns.

Would you get onboard a plane that lands without crashing 85% of the time?

This is why I said that the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) only targeting the spike protien may turn out to be a flaw in their design.